Alta, UT - April 4, 5, 9, 11, 12 & 15, 2015

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Days 50-55 for my season included everything from boredom to some fresh snow, to perfect corn before culminating in the best powder day of the year. Yeah, April's a roller coaster!

The weekend of April 4-5 I just couldn't get excited about. The weather was sunny but chilly and breezy, which meant that things were taking forever to soften and I really didn't have the patience to wait. It was also so empty that it was kind of depressing as the snow on south-facing aspects across the street had nearly disappeared.

20150404_092458_001.jpg


It was the last weekend that my Serbian friends were in town, but that wasn't enough to keep me in the canyon past 1 p.m. either day. On Saturday I tooled around on Sunnyside with them and their son Sava, now barely 4 years old, and shot some video that Google automatically edited into this short clip:

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNYJTZ8OJHQ[/video]

20150404_122000.jpg


Then, on the 9th a 10-inch snowstorm reinvigorated my affection for what remains of the ski season. It fell as dense, almost graupel-like snow that kept you off the bottom nearly all of the time. The run of the morning was Armpit, which was deep, untracked and absolutely consistent. You could drop it at warp speed with nary a care in the world. I reluctantly left at 11:30 in time to make a 1 p.m. appointment for work.

20150409_094528.jpg


I was thus in a far better mood when the weekend of the 11th and 12th arrived. Under sunshine and warm temperatures, the morning's hardpack quickly evolved into the most perfect corn that one could hope for.

20150412_133334.jpg


20150411_105950_012.jpg


We reveled in the spring weather, even taking the opportunity to picnic lunch off the Summer Road.

20150411_124857.jpg


IMG_2144a.jpg


20150412_150232.jpg


Corn is fun and all, but it's no true substitute for powder. That's what made today so special.

19" of new fell between closing yesterday and opening today, and it was up to 22" and still coming down hard when I left at noon to return to work.

It was the biggest overnight snowfall of the year, but most locals have apparently already given up on the season. The 9:15 a.m. opening time came and went with little happening, yet the pre-opening line never grew beyond the modest maze set up by the lifties. It wasn't until 9:45 or so before we finally got to board, but boy, oh boy was it worth the wait!

20150415_113000_015.jpg


20150415_113017_020.jpg


photo (1) crop.JPG


photo crop.JPG


With Sugarloaf and Sunnyside both closed for an unspecified reason (given their proximity to one another I suspect it was power), and Backside and Ballroom/Baldy Shoulder off limits we were really hemmed in to just a fraction of the available landscape, but with so few people there today it truly didn't matter. We were getting untracked face shots on every freakin' turn right up until I left at noon. Today was the best day of the year, bar none.
 
admin":29ro4s1x said:
With Sugarloaf and Sunnyside both closed for an unspecified reason (given their proximity to one another I suspect it was power), and Backside and Ballroom/Baldy Shoulder off limits
Looks like tomorrow will be worthy also. :drool:
 
Wish I could. I have a 10 a.m. conference call that will likely last an hour. Perhaps I will take a run each before and after the call, but I doubt it.
 
Admin":mne82nk9 said:
Wish I could. I have a 10 a.m. conference call that will likely last an hour. Perhaps I will take a run each before and after the call, but I doubt it.

Screw it, I cashed in a PTO day for tomorrow and made it official. It's gonna be a long summer anyway.
 
Skrad, I honestly don't believe that 40" claim. When they were claiming 36" in 24, at that point the Snow Cam 24-hour time lapse showed about 16" with minimal settling.

Meanwhile the mid Collins automated snow plot shows another 5" after closing yesterday for a storm total of 31". The snow report claims 34", which means 3" of settling.
 
ballsdeep.jpeg
Admin":5w7l3k4o said:
Skrad, I honestly don't believe that 40" claim. When they were claiming 36" in 24, at that point the Snow Cam 24-hour time lapse showed about 16" with minimal settling.

I'm not sure what's up with their time lapse, but there was nowhere near only 16 inches yesterday.

This was our very first run yesterday morning. My Buddy Travis isn't very tall, but he certainly isn't a midget. If you'll notice his balls area seems to be coddled by snow...

This was after skiing, add the balls deep to what is on my truck and I'd believe their number.
 

Attachments

  • afterskiing.jpeg
    afterskiing.jpeg
    42.6 KB · Views: 10,974
Evan at OpenSnow explained the unusual nature of this "shallow storm."
OpenSnow":rns2u7di said:
Yesterday was “Tax Day” and boy did we all get a refund in the mail! It was a shallow storm that had a difficult time getting enough forcing to push precip up to the crest of the Wasatch. That’s why Snowbird is reporting 48-hour totals of 42″ over it’s neighbor Alta at 35″. It’s also why if you were out yesterday, you may have noticed that the lower half of the mountain was seeing heavier snow than the upper half. Brighton, which is just northeast of Alta got 18″ and PCMR is reporting 12″.

JIm Steenburgh analyzed it too:
http://wasatchweatherweenies.blogspot.c ... mpage.html
 
So what that means is that Snowbird is being selective on where they report from. Normally they pull data from the Gad 2 plot, which is at 9,840'. This time I'm speculating that they pulled it from the base area (there's a weather station adjacent to the Tram Plaza at 8,100 feet), based on the theories put forth above. I personally looked at the 24-hour time lapse of the Gad 2 Snow Cam at the very time that they were claiming a 24-hour total of 36", and saw with my own eyes only 16" stack up on the measurement board. That concerns me because if they're being selective about using the most advantageous number to put out to the public, it would skew snowfall totals to their benefit.

I'll post about today once I get a peek at Corey's photos, as I took none of my own. A lot of folks, however, must have believed that 42" claim because Alta's lifts were ski-on, while the Snowbird parking lots overflowed and cars were parked bumper to bumper on both sides of LCC Road from Entry 4 all the way down to Entry 1. That has to be the biggest parking overflow I've ever witnessed there.
 
Admin":2y4x6hot said:
So what that means is that Snowbird is being selective on where they report from. Normally they pull data from the Gad 2 plot, which is at 9,840'. This time I'm speculating that they pulled it from the base area (there's a weather station adjacent to the Tram Plaza at 8,100 feet), based on the theories put forth above. I personally looked at the 24-hour time lapse of the Gad 2 Snow Cam at the very time that they were claiming a 24-hour total of 36", and saw with my own eyes only 16" stack up on the measurement board. That concerns me because if they're being selective about using the most advantageous number to put out to the public, it would skew snowfall totals to their benefit.


Or, it could be that seeing as how Gad2 is now closed they're taking measurements on terrain you can actually ski? All I know is that there was definitely WAY more snow than 16 inches. It was also exactly as described in the articles above. We never rode Little Cloud once, we rode Wilbere a few times till other people caught on and a line formed. Regulator and Little Cloud Bowl had a definite bottom, whereas the lower mountain was chokingly deep. That pic I posted above was on Cat Crew Cut Off.
 
BobMc":3g2lv1zl said:
Or, it could be that seeing as how Gad2 is now closed they're taking measurements on terrain you can actually ski?

Perhaps. For me, the important point is that they need to be consistent in how they report, not cherry pick reporting locations depending on storm peculiarities (if in fact that's what they're doing). We noticed, too, that the snow was way deeper in lower North Rustler than it was higher on the hill. Alta, however, continued to report storm totals from the Mid-Collins plot at 9,662 feet -- as well they should.

BobMc":3g2lv1zl said:
All I know is that there was definitely WAY more snow than 16 inches.

I don't doubt you one bit, but I also do not doubt that Gad 2 time lapse that I watched myself. The whole elevation thing lends some sense to it all.

And now that I've seen a few photos of you on Facebook, I now know who that guy was who I'd occasional encounter in lift lines this winter with whom I'd exchange greetings and pleasantries before I'd ski off and turn to a buddy to say, "I have no idea who that was." #-o Dang, I wish that you had clued me in! Will we be seeing you at the party on the 26th? You and Marc_C can even share a beer.
 
Admin":3siuvqv2 said:
And now that I've seen a few photos of you on Facebook, I now know who that guy was who I'd occasional encounter in lift lines this winter with whom I'd exchange greetings and pleasantries before I'd ski off and turn to a buddy to say, "I have no idea who that was." #-o Dang, I wish that you had clued me in! Will we be seeing you at the party on the 26th? You and Marc_C can even share a beer.

That might have been me once this season, I think I remember saying hi. I've only been over to Alta twice this season, both times the lift lines chased me back to Snowbird! I've seen Bobby and Amy quite a few times, said hi a couple of them. (That grey outfit of Bobby's stands out, I recognize him from a ways away.) You followed me up the canyon one day this season, I honked and waved as I turned onto the bypass.

Ski areas are neat places, even though lots of tourists filter through you begin to notice the folks that are there all the time. Wednesday in the tram line it was funny how many familiar faces I saw, weekday in April and yet the same folks were there. Last weekend I went to Solitude both days, did the closing day "Partyhorn" 4:20 tradition, it was the same group of folks that were there when I left two years ago.

I still have one pass for Alta remaining, I've been holding it for closing weekend. I'll not share a beer with Marc, but I'd be happy to give him a draw off my wine. See ya there!
 
admin":2v5ual4e said:
For me, the important point is that they need to be consistent in how they report, not cherry pick reporting locations depending on storm peculiarities (if in fact that's what they're doing). We noticed, too, that the snow was way deeper in lower North Rustler than it was higher on the hill. Alta, however, continued to report storm totals from the Mid-Collins plot at 9,662 feet -- as well they should.
The official patrol plot is the one at the base of the tram. I have inquired about this several times and always gotten the same answer. What Snowbird marketing puts on its website for daily updates is a mystery. Also noteworthy is that Steenburgh frequently refers to a SNOTEL at 9,600 feet in the mid-Gad area. Why Snowbird (patrol and marketing) would not use that site for its snowfall measurements is the real mystery.

Just to :stir: admin's pot further, Steenburgh's book has a color-coded map of his estimate of Wasatch snowfall. The over 600-inches bullseye is not at the top of Catherine's as admin contends, but in the area surrounding American Forks Twin Peaks.

During Iron Blosam Week I visited Alta patrol and got the Collins data, which goes back to 1980-81. This was prompted by Steenburgh posting the AltaGuard data (maintained by UDOT) for the base area, and my realizing that my "Alta" data was a mix of the 2 sites. The data has now been sorted out, but a question remains that is not likely to be resolved. The ratio of Alta Collins 9,660 snowfall to Alta Guard 8,700 snowfall is 95% from 1981-1998 and 110% since then.
 
Tony Crocker":2c17ifgb said:
The over 600-inches bullseye is not at the top of Catherine's as admin contends, but in the area surrounding American Forks Twin Peaks.
So the actual average snowfall is 350 inches, putting Alta behind Jay Peak?
 
Back
Top