Bariloche reputation is great resort/apres-ski town. Snowfall is not great as it's low and well east of the Andes crest. There is snowmaking but frequently the lower mountain is not covered, so transport lifts bypass it.
Based upon what we know about your skiing, Valle Nevado in Chile is probably your best bet. I have not been to either place, only to Las Lenas, which I do not think is a good fit for you.
Is it better to stay on-mountain or in Bariloche? That is, would Bariloche be too inconvenient, and on-mountain not worth it due to lack of activities besides skiing?
Is it better to stay on-mountain or in Bariloche? That is, would Bariloche be too inconvenient, and on-mountain not worth it due to lack of activities besides skiing?
I would definately stay in Bariloche. There isn't much going on up by the mountain. City of Bariloche is definately the place to stay. Lots of great resturants, bars and fun things to do in Bariloche.
It is only about a $7 US taxi ride from the town to the mountain and the bus is lett than a dollar.
Here is a great NY Times article on skiing in Bariloche: