007":1vsrsnjw said:How long are the drives, time-wise? And do they pass thru geography that makes AWD/4WD or chains a good idea (or requirement) if the weather turns bad?
Thanks!
IIRC, it was about 3 hours, give or take. Pretty spectacular scenery looking south and then west into the Beartooths, but Admin is correct regarding the dangers in a wind-driven snow event once you're off I-90.Admin":3hyqrlxr said:I've done it, although it's been a few years so I don't remember the exact time. It's a fairly brainless drive, although once you angle southeast from I-90 toward Red Lodge you spend some time atop a treeless high plateau that must be "sporting" if you've got wind driven snow. Otherwise it seems fairly painless.
Mike Bernstein":2zaz1s41 said:IIRC, it was about 3 hours, give or take. Pretty spectacular scenery looking south and then west into the Beartooths, but Admin is correct regarding the dangers in a wind-driven snow event once you're off I-90.
Well, I'm living in SoCal now, so I'll probably be diversifying away from SKIVT-L and the like. This forum seems to have some of the best beta on Baldy and Waterman, which (Hwy 2 willing) is where I want to be spending my ski days outside of the occasional jaunt up in Mammoth.Admin":1w171nhf said:Mike Bernstein":1w171nhf said:IIRC, it was about 3 hours, give or take. Pretty spectacular scenery looking south and then west into the Beartooths, but Admin is correct regarding the dangers in a wind-driven snow event once you're off I-90.
9 posts in 4 years, and my old driving buddy pops in to recount our trip! Great to hear from ya, Mike!
You'll soon learn to reverse that priority and plan the bulk of your seasons around Mammoth trips. If Baldy/Waterman are good, that's icing on the cake. In 10 of my 33 seasons Baldy and Waterman were never worth skiing. But with El Nino in place this season the odds of good local skiing are better than usual.Baldy and Waterman..... is where I want to be spending my ski days outside of the occasional jaunt up in Mammoth.
You're right. I said that poorly. Mammoth will be my home hill - I even bought the MVP Pass in lieu of attending a friend's bachelor party in New Orleans during Jazz Fest due to budget constraints.Tony Crocker":35vgwzer said:You'll soon learn to reverse that priority and plan the bulk of your seasons around Mammoth trips. If Baldy/Waterman are good, that's icing on the cake. In 10 of my 33 seasons Baldy and Waterman were never worth skiing. But with El Nino in place this season the odds of good local skiing are better than usual.Baldy and Waterman..... is where I want to be spending my ski days outside of the occasional jaunt up in Mammoth.
Summit and Bear have state-of-the-art snowmaking, grooming, a lake water source and are in majority operation by Christmas 80+% of seasons. Lots of spring conditions in warm weather but rain/freezes are rare. Mt. High I view as "in-between." Terrain is better than Big Bear when everything is open but still far short of Baldy. Snowmaking covers most terrain but cannot sustain it very long as at Big Bear due to much lower water capacity. I have not skied Mt. High since 2001, but not due any inherent dislike of the area. SoCal skiing tends to be feast (Baldy/Waterman) or famine (Big Bear) with not a lot of the in-between conditions that might incline me to favor Mt. High.Are Mtn High, Snow Summit or Bear even worth my time?