Kicking Horse Mountain Resort, BC 2/14/05-2/16/05

J.Spin

New member
Links to pictures are available at the bottom of the text

Last week we headed up to Kicking Horse Mountain Resort near Golden, British Columbia for a couple of days. Although Kicking Horse also got hit with the unseasonably warm temperatures that plagued much of British Columbia and the northwestern U.S. in January, their relatively high elevation (summit = 8,033 feet) meant that they received heavy snow on the upper half of the mountain instead of rain. So, despite the poor snow season in the area, the upper mountain actually has its deepest base (300 cm, ~118 inches) since the resort has been in operation (~5 seasons). They are reporting a mid-mountain base depth of 152 cm (~60 inches), and they actually have all 106 of their runs open. Although everything on the lower mountain is skiable (base elevation = 3,900 feet), the groomed runs are the best bet because the ungroomed runs (bumps etc.) have a lot of hard snow. The groomed runs on the entire mountain were excellent packed powder, except for a few spots of ice that formed from runoff at the very bottom (4,000 foot elevation range). There had been no substantial snow in the two weeks leading up to our trip, but sun-protected terrain on the upper mountain still had surprisingly soft snow, and even powder in places. They don't get a huge amount of skier traffic, which obviously helps in terms of snow quality.


I've posted some pictures from the trip at:

http://www.JandEproductions.com/2005/14FEB05.html


Greg has also posted some pictures at his website:

http://gprior.eskilade.com/2005_0216-Kicking


J.Spin
 
Awesome photos!!

And if y'all think that looked pretty incredible...hit this place on a powder day. I did that 2 years ago, and I was amazed. I plan to get back.

The snow in BC (on normal snow years) is the best I've ever experienced, and, it seems to snow pretty frequently. Maybe not feet at a time, but enough inches to make it feel bottomless and ethereal.

A BC trip that includes KHMR, Whitewater and Red cannot be beat in snow quality and price. Why go anywhere else?
 
These places do NOT have a corner on snow quality, as you can tell by reading my trip reports from last week of January. 2001 was worse than this year, and 2003 was only a little bit better. I was also up there in 1997, 1999 and 2002, which were outstanding. But for consistent good snow they are not even close to Alta/Snowbird or Targhee in reliability. Probably not as consistent as Mammoth, Kirkwood or the Whistler alpine either. The attractions are interesting terrain, cheap prices and low skier density. If you get powder, you'll have plenty of time to enjoy it.

Whitewater is at about the southern limit of a large climate zone with Alta/Targhee type reliability. Unfortunately Whitewater is a tiny area unless you do backcountry. Everything farther north at 5,000+ elevation is snowcat or heliskiing. Red and Fernie get much of the same weather, but with half of terrain below 5,000 they are vulnerable to rain.
 
Back
Top