Mustang Powder Snowcat, Jan. 17-20, 2012

Tony Crocker

Administrator
Staff member
I arrived at Mustang as the season storm track was finally moving south, with steadily declining temperatures to the north. Nonetheless there had been about 2 feet of recent snow in Mustang’s tenure and with the frigid temperatures it stayed light and deep. Overall this was the second deepest snow of my snowcat trips since 1997, exceeded only by Chatter Creek in 2008.

Jan. 17
The first day had thick overcast so nearly all of the skiing was in the trees. Temperatures started at 0F and declined to about -6F by the end of the day. I struggled a bit with the temperatures, usually warming up some on the cat rides, but the heat inside was not that much as my water bottle actually had an ice film in it by the end of the day. In fairness, clothing and body heat are usually more than enough to keep comfortable inside a snowcat, so ultimately it’s my problem to figure out the appropriate level of clothing to wear. I was also wearing goggles and did not notice for awhile that any fogging inside them was freezing.

The trees were fairly steep, so I had some adjustment using my Head Jimis, which as Adam noted when I got them are more of a big mountain than pure powder ski. The 5th run had more spacing so I picked up the speed some. About 2/3 of the way down I missed a mild contour change and crashed, losing a ski and sliding about 30 feet before coming to rest.
IMG_1829.JPG

I fell next to the small bare shrub at center right. In the deep snow it was slow going to work uphill toward where I fell. Owner Nick was tail guiding and soon came by to assist from the top down. He worked his way down to me with no success. This took 15 minutes or so, so he radioed the cat to take another run while we continued the search. Nick finally noticed some intermittent vertical lines on the snow below us, followed them down 20 feet or so and recovered my ski. Nick after recovering my ski.
IMG_1831.JPG

My goggles were completely hopeless by now, so I skied the rest of the run without them, reaching the pickup point about 5 minutes ahead of guide Bruno leading the rest of the group on a repeat lap. Nick skiing the lower part, which was a clear cut.
IMG_1838.JPG


This turned out to be the first of 4 lost ski incidents (one more today and the others on day 3, thankfully none of them mine). In all of them the ski ended up below where the fallen skier came to rest, as was also the case for Mark Meisner at Snowbird last March 8. On day 3 we were skiing a steep open section one at a time and those of us at the bottom saw the ski eject and run on the surface for over 200 yards before diving into the snow. Lesson learned: fat skis are designed to float and they may continue to do so for some time after they come off your feet.

The clouds lifted a bit for this view at one of the pickups.
IMG_1840.JPG


Dropping into one of the deep tree runs.
IMG_1843a.jpg


The last run presented an opportunity for our youngest skier Ben to huck a ~20 footer.
IMG_1844.JPG

He crashed the landing. After a few minutes Bruno led us down to wait in the cat for the 10 minutes more it took to recover Ben’s ski. Despite starting out at 10:30AM after the first day transceiver drill, all of the skiing being in the trees and the 2 lost ski incidents, most of the group skied 15,600 vertical. Make that 13,800 for me with one missed run.

Jan. 18
We were warned last night that it would get colder, but at breakfast the official lodge temperature was -22F, which is a record for me by 10 degrees. So I wore 4 upper layers under my ski suit, a face mask and the neoprene Boot Glove over my boots. This kept me functional through the morning, particularly since I also wiped down my goggles after every run to prevent the freezing fog buildup. The snow was a bit denser in the extreme cold and on the first run my tips seemed to dive some. Unlike at Niseko last year, I remembered that my Head Railflex bindings are on a track and got guide Corey to set them back 1.5 cm on the ski.

It was not as cloudy so we were in subalpine terrain soon.
IMG_1850a.jpg


It cleared up more, so midday we went up to a high drop point at 8,200 feet where I had been 2 years ago. View SE down the 3,500 vertical Love Me Longtimes we skied then.
IMG_1856.JPG

Note the slide path this time. Corey didn’t want us skiing super long runs in the unusually cold weather. Late in day we got a view of the Love Me Longtimes drainage (shaded right of the top peak)
IMG_1880.JPG


From the 8,200 drop here’s the view NE down another long run Fifth Dimension.
IMG_1857.JPG


We skied west down Eldorado. The upper section was wind affected (fortunately no wind while we were up there) but by the time we got down to 7,000 feet it was soft and deep again.
IMG_1867a.jpg


Another pickup lower down.
IMG_1870.JPG


Here’s a good shot of the usually comfortable Monashee tree spacing.
IMG_1872.JPG


While Mustang is not on private land like Island Lake, they have influenced some of the logging on their public tenure to be gladed.

Around 1:30 it warmed up to a max of -2F before falling back to -10F when we were done skiing at 4:30. We went back into the alpine, but only to about 7,500 to stay in the good snow.
IMG_1873a.jpg

IMG_1875.JPG


Cloud 9 Peak, often seen in Mustang’s brochures and posters.
IMG_1877.JPG


This was a scenic day but I was sparing in use of the camera as I rarely was comfortable taking my hand out of my mitten, even wearing glove liners. I skied better than the day before, mostly due to cleaning the goggles regularly and my feet being more comfortable with the Boot Gloves. We skied 16,500 and I was getting some muscle burn late in the day. With predicted mostly tree skiing for the next 2 days I decided to switch to Mustang’s demo skis, which I believed would be less work with more rocker.

Jan. 19
We started coming out of the cold snap overnight. It was -3F when we started and got up to +5 in the afternoon. I wore 3 layers under the suit vs. 4, only needed the face mask for 2 runs but continued using the Boot Gloves. We have Bruno as guide again, and he is more ambitious about choosing more “sporting” lines. In this general area, named Christians and Lions on their map, there are tight entrances but wide open deep powder below.
IMG_1882.JPG

This one had two entries and the first person in skier’s left lost a ski (it ran almost as far down as where I’m taking the picture) and got stuck between some trees. So the rest of us were sent skier’s right and the tight entry was already scraped down when I went 5th. Nonetheless from the pic above you can see the snow is good when it opens up. And it was very deep in the trees below us.

We returned to an even narrower entry that needed to be sideslipped.
IMG_1885.JPG

When it opened up I temporarily lost my balance and had to sit down. It was steep enough that the powder started to sluff. I realized I was sluffing with it and quickly stood up and skied out of it. Zoom from below of sideslip entry and then tracks below.
IMG_1890.JPG

IMG_1889.JPG


Mustang has added a 3rd cat with a new program, Small Groups, Steep Chutes. This group must occasionally hike or skin up to more technical terrain not directly accessible by snowcat. I have my AT gear along on this trip, but Mustang’s regular program is plenty challenging for me. If Bruno was auditioning us for the Steep Chutes program on these two runs I don’t think too many of us passed.

By early afternoon we got some sunny breaks and moved higher. Showtime was a long pitch and one of everyone’s favorites.
IMG_1893.JPG

IMG_1896.JPG


Finally we went back up to Cloud 9. View down as the cat departs.
IMG_1899a.jpg


We traverse the other way.
IMG_1901.JPG


And then ski this.
IMG_1904.JPG

IMG_1908a.jpg


Total for the day was 18,600 vertical, finishing at 4:40PM, just barely a record for my cat skiing slightly more than one of the days here in 2010. I skied on the Armada TST, liked them a lot in the deep snow.

Jan. 20
Temperatures have finally risen to a more normal range of 15-20F. It snowed off and on so we’re mostly in the trees as on the first day. Corey is our guide and the tree runs have mostly ideal spacing, so not too much work even for those wearing down after 3 days. Most of the runs end in clear cuts with nearly effortless powder cruising or airing buried tree stumps for the more energetic. While the skiing was epic in quality it was not photogenic in the weather. Here Cameron was surprised by this hole in the clear cut and is being assisted by the tail guide.
IMG_1910.JPG

Cameron was skiing right in front of me, so I pulled up when he suddenly disappeared.

Here’s the bottom of one of the tree runs.
IMG_1911a.jpg

This run Crème Brulee Couloir started behind the big rock at top and curled around to the open slope at left below it.
IMG_1913a.jpg

Despite the name it was wide open with plenty of room for untracked skiing.

On departure day we come in at 3:45. Here the lodge dog Stella (3 year old 135 lb Pyrenee) checks out the luggage loading.
IMG_1917.JPG

She lounged in the snow even on the -22F day.

We skied 16,400 for the day and 67,100 in 4 days if you missed no runs. A couple of people would get tired enough to sit out a run or two late in the day. The Armada TST's definitely reduced the amount of work expended in the trees. After the first 2 days I had mild concern that I might wear down enough to need a break. That would be a painful decision when the skiing is this good.

This trip was as impressive as 2 years ago, with deeper snow and demonstration that the tree skiing was of the same high quality as the alpine. I intend to return here as long as I am up to it. Considering Mustang’s snow and terrain quality and average vertical of 16,500 per day, I am less motivated to heliski in Canada, where my average vertical is only slightly more at 18,000.
 
Tony Crocker":39efptha said:
We returned to an even narrower entry that needed to be sideslipped.
View attachment 17
When it opened up I temporarily lost my balance and had to sit down. It was steep enough that the powder started to sluff. I realized I was sluffing with it and quickly stood up and skied out of it. Zoom from below of sideslip entry and then tracks below.
View attachment 18

That's not a sideslip, that's a straightline!
 
Looks like a great trip (or in your case, early part of a trip), if a bit on the chilly side.
 
Great photos, beautiful scenary and the skiing looked fantastic. Thanks for posting. Just out of curiousity, how much does the snowcat skiing cost per day and is the price all inclusive (i.e., lodging, meals and skiing)?
 
Tony, looks like a great trip and beautiful pictures -- credit to you and Mother Nature, both. Also, up until now, I had seen you more as a numbers man; this here is the "softer" side :-)
 
I would assume the $900, which applies from early January to mid-March. I think it's speculative to pay for cat skiing in shoulder season, unless it's short notice and you know it's good. Mustang gets so much snow that it does open in early December, noticeably earlier than any other cat/heli operator I know about. But terrain will be more limited, if only due to limited buildout of the cat roads. In spring without fresh snow exposure will become important for powder quality. With the temperatures I had this time we actually liked south exposure!

The steep chutes program is an extra $50 per day. The regular program is still more rigorous than any other cat operation I have attended. Terrain is steeper on average and vertical is 50% more. So for most people it's not the right place for a first cat skiing experience. If you can comfortably keep up with Admin & BobbyD on a big LCC powder day, then you should be fine at Mustang. Or for the easterners, with JSpin, Riverc0il or Patrick on a big Vermont powder day.
 
Wow, looked like a great time. My only comparison is Monashee Powder Cats last February (highly recommend). I'd say Mustang easily has more impressive terrain, notably alpine. Can't go wrong with Monashee trees at either operation. We remarkably got over 20k on our last day; helped being our guide's birthday. Monashee is a great spot for first-time cat skiers, but I should give Mustang a go next time considering how nice the terrain looks.

cheers
 
Nick and Ali Holmes-Smith founded both Mustang and Monashee Powder Cats. When it came time to build permanent lodges they chose to keep Mustang and sell Monashee. I asked Nick why and he said Mustang's tenure is bigger and it gets a bit more snow. He said terrain is similar; Mustang just has more. If you're doing 20K of Monashee trees in a day it sounds like the same philosophy as Mustang and not for first timers unless they have extensive powder experience.

I also found the article in March 2010 Aspen Times.
https://www.aspentimes.com/news/powder- ... -columbia/
The author Bob Ward's brother Bill Ward was a year ahead of me in junior high school. I was on the last 3 days of their 5 day tour at Mustang 2 years ago.
 
Marc_C":248nqdx6 said:
berkshireskier":248nqdx6 said:
Great photos, beautiful scenary and the skiing looked fantastic. Thanks for posting. Just out of curiousity, how much does the snowcat skiing cost per day and is the price all inclusive (i.e., lodging, meals and skiing)?
All inclusive, $600-$900 CAN per day.
http://mustangpowder.com/booking.htm?RD=1
Thanks for the info. Looks like BC heli-skiing is about $1,500 to $1,700/day during the prime season, so the snowcat skiing is quite a bit less. But I would assume you would get less vertical and a smaller potential ski area with the snowcats, but no downtime for bad weather and a less risk of helicopter crashes. Interesting trade-off.
 
Heli places with high alpine over 8,000 feet let you push the reliable season through at least the end of March, as I observed twice with TLH and once with RK.

In general the extra $ you pay for heli gets you somewhat proportionally extra vertical. Mustang, White Grizzly and possibly Monashee snowcats are exceptions to that rule.

A recent Ski Canada article commented that you are more likely to ski steep terrain in a cat. Cat tenures are smaller, thus terrain is repeat skied after new storms, operators can get more comfortable with stability. Heli tenures are so huge, they need to be conservative about infrequently skied slopes with avalanche potential. I'm inclined to agree with this based upon what I've seen, at least in Canada. We know that's not true with the maritime Alaska snowpack though.
 
Back
Top