Admin":7vno6gyj said:
The Kid rode the lift with Ashley Battersby, with whom first he got a chance to chat at the athlete autograph session at SnowJam 2006 last weekend. My wife and I know her folks, and she ended up giving The Kid her cell phone number to hook up at Alta tomorrow, so we may be getting schooled on Saturday.
How old is The Kid now? He looks much older and maybe its just the photos you take, but he looks like he's got some style. Four years ago at Bromley (50F spring day in January; some things never change) he was pretty good but just looked like he needed to get out more often. Amazing how fast people can pick up the sport...especially at this age. Dave, who I know you've seen skiing in pretty much all my reports last year, came to Vermont knowing he wanted to ski a lot but due to geographic factors was only able to get out a few times per year in high school. Looking back on video from one of the Dec '03 Nor'easters (my first Dec in college and it snows 5 feet in Burlington and 7-9 feet in the mtns...I thought that was how it was going to be, ha), Dave definitely had the natural ability but if you compare it to a video from last season, he's taken it up a notch or two.
Myself on the other hand, I don't seem like I've changed, haha. My style looks exactly the same...don't leave the ground too often, for a long and lanky kid I ski pretty low to the ground, too. I think skiing bumps, bumps and more bumps as a kid must've led to my hunched-over style...I also ski like the "heaviest" lanky kid around. Fall like a ton of bricks and dig as deep as possible into pow.
Anyway, if you ski with Battersby...you better have the camera ready. The Kid is a lucky one.
Tony Crocker":7vno6gyj said:
Topography of Alta lends itself to much more being skiable on the ~30 inch base you have than Snowbird. I recommend rock skis based upon my Christmas 1986 experience, though I think Snowbird has put in some (don't know if enough) lower mountain snowmaking since then.
30" base opens every trail in the east...its funny to think of rock skis for X-Mas with a 30" base. The majority of the 150" per year resorts (Adirondacks, through Southern VT and most of NH up into Sunday River) have a hard time getting a 30" base at any point in the season and usually max out around there. Northern VT usually maxes out at 70-90" (Mansfield and Jay stations).
What's always interested me is how much bigger the western ski areas are but that the actual vertical drop isn't that different. Gore in the Adirondacks has the same amount of vertcal as Alta...same with Stowe. Yet, even in the east, Stowe seems to ski a lot larger than Gore, and Alta larger still. Mount Snow, VT looks like a sledding hill to me but has the similar vertical as Big Cottonwood Canyon areas and a few spots (Alpine Meadows) around Tahoe.
I have still yet to fully understand how the same vertical drop or even higher vertical drop in the east, seems not comparable with the west in any way. Total acres make the western areas "bigger" but I still get surprised when I actually look up some of the vertical drops of famed wesern mountains. Standing on the top of the Chin at Stowe with a solid 2,500 vertical to go, doesn't seem the same as lthe same thing out west.
Anyone know how much snow tree-skiing areas out west (say Steamboat) need on the ground to open the runs up? 30" of snowpack in the east will have every ski area 100% open. Heck, Stowe's 30" of snow in Oct/early Nov had the entire mountain skiable, even the woods on the top half of he mountain and i think depth probably maxed out at 20-24".