ChrisC":3damf2b0 said:
			
		
	
	
		
		
			I have a pretty favorable impression of Snowmass. It surpassed a lot of my expectations. After Vail, I think it is one the best all things to all people places for Colorado.
However, 12-18" might really be too much for some of its intermediate runs.
		
		
	 
Chris let me give you a little hint.  Vail sucks.  Snowmass beats Vail hands down.  When the locals of Aspen/Snowmass say "Vail Sucks" the people at Vail think it is just a competitive spirit, but the truth is they really mean it.  The people who like Vail can stay there.
So here is why Vail sucks.
- It is super crowded because of its location.  A 45 minute line is a regular event, but at Aspen/Snowmass you'll be lucky to find any lift lines and 10 minutes would be exceptionally long.
- Powder... what powder at Vail?  On a powder day you'll be lucky to get two runs.  It's gone within 90 minutes.  At Aspen/Snowmass you'll find untracked stuff all-day and for days after a major storm.
- There is nothing difficult in Vail.  Zilch.  They actually groom a double diamond run in Vail.  At Snowmass we've got a great variety of terrain including the very difficult Burn Side Cliffs and Hanging Valley Wall.
- Cat tracks are every where.  A complete run without a cat track section is almost unheard of on the front size of Vail.
- The Bowls face south.  On a typical day after a storm the snow turns rotten within hours because of the high amount of traffic and the south exposure.
I could go on and on.  The ONLY thing that is better at Vail is on mountain dining.  However, that too is a very crowded experience that can be very frustrating.  Beaver Creek is actually a better mountain than Vail.
Aspen/Snowmass is the best kept secret in Colorado.  Four very different mountains on one lift ticket and Snowmass is arguably the best mountain in Colorado.
Yes, I ski Snowmass a lot.  I skied more than a million vertical feet this year and 34 out of 38 days were at Snowmass.