Tahoe is a mess....The toxic blend of billionaires and angry townies has become unbearable.

ChrisC

Well-known member
I immensely liked this article because it mimics some of my feelings on Tahoe skiing. Not 100%, but accurate enough.

The author used to be able to ski easily every weekend in Seattle -- I agree.
Realizes you need a ski house share in Tahoe to ski -- I agree.
Does not to play a game of musical bunk beds with a dozen other adults every weekend -- I agree.




Tahoe is a mess, so I found a California ski area that actually works

Column: Tahoe’s toxic blend of billionaires and angry townies has become unbearable​


I tried to make skiing in Tahoe’s winter paradise work. I avoided sky-high hotel prices by sleeping in my car during nights so cold I woke up with all my food frozen solid. I drove up from San Francisco at odd hours to try to avoid traffic. I waited in pre-dawn lift lines in the hopes of actually getting a few good runs in. But in the end, Tahoe just wasn’t worth it. Somewhat surprisingly, I’ve found an alternative. I just have to drive even farther to get to it.

This season, I’m snowboarding at Mammoth Mountain. People gasp when I tell them I’m driving seven hours one-way just to go snowboarding. If you told me three years ago I was regularly doing this drive I’d never believe you. But I’ve never been happier.

1735506917841.png


Mammoth’s high-speed chairs, like the Broadway Express pictured here, quickly move people up the mountain.
Lester Black/SFGATE

That’s partially because Mammoth Lakes is an actual functioning community. There’s a free bus system, manageable traffic, a mountain that can handle crowds and a friendly atmosphere that is a blast of refreshing mountain air compared to Tahoe’s toxic blend of billionaires and angry townies. But my happiness isn’t just because Mammoth is a great mountain, it’s also because I know that Tahoe is a total s—tshow.

1735507404826.png

FILE: Skiers crowd in line to enter a gondola lift to the top of Heavenly Ski Resort in South Lake Tahoe, Calif.
George Rose/Getty Images

I moved to San Francisco three years ago from Seattle, a place where city-dwellers wanting to ski every single weekend isn’t a fairy tale dream like it is in California. Seattle has four ski resorts within two hours of the city, including one just 50 miles away on an interstate that rarely shuts down, making it possible to work a full-time job in the city and still ski your face off.

When I moved to San Francisco, I thought maintaining a skiing lifestyle would still be possible. I looked up the distance and saw Tahoe was only three and a half hours away from the city, so I thought how bad could it be? It turns out that drive time was just a Google Maps mirage.
The Lake Tahoe Basin is a recipe for traffic gridlock. There are over a dozen ski resorts within a few hours’ drive of 10 million people, but they are accessed by only a handful of highways. That means the 3.5-hour drive I naively thought I could make from San Francisco can easily stretch to over nine hours.

Tahoe adds an insult to injury, because not only is there intense traffic getting there, there’s also nonstop gridlock as soon as you exit the interstate. It’s not unusual for someone to spend a winter weekend in Tahoe alternating between hourslong traffic jams like they’re shuffling between buffets on a cruise ship.


1735507176179.png

FILE: Traffic on Interstate 80 in February 2024.
Caltrans District 3


1735507202373.png

FILE: Skiers flock to Palisades Tahoe ski resort in Olympic Valley, Calif., on March 4, 2024.
Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images

The traffic also isn’t relegated to the roads. Tahoe’s ski lifts are packed throughout most weekends, and the worst among them is Palisades, the area’s largest ski resort. It has some of the best terrain in North America, but if you go there on a weekend you’ll only be salivating for its chutes and bowls while standing in a 45-minute lift line. Palisades’ owner, the massive Alterra Mountain Company, looked at its weekend lift problems and decided to spend $65 million building a gondola that transports people between two parking lots rather than building anything that will get more people up the mountain.

All of these challenges were on my mind when I was preparing for this season, yet like a true addict I couldn’t give up snowboarding. In fact, I decided to double down and spend even more money on the Sisyphean pursuit of snowboarding while living in the city. I decided to get a “ski lease,” a term I had never heard growing up in Seattle. The idea that I needed to pay for my own apartment in the city AND pay for a lease in the mountains just to be able to ski was laughable the first year I moved here, but after three years of trying to ski without a lease in the mountains, I realized this wild California invention was actually going to become necessary.

So, I started looking for leases. In Tahoe’s exorbitant real estate market, a ski lease means cramming into packed shared houses. It looked like buying an expensive ticket to play a game of musical bunk beds with a dozen other adults every weekend. I’ve couchsurfed in plenty of undesirable accommodations, but the idea of spending thousands of dollars to do so didn’t sit right.

I broadened my ski lease search to any ski resort in California. I eventually stumbled on a private room in an old A-frame house in Mammoth Lakes that was renting for an affordable monthly rate. I hesitated at first, knowing it would be nearly twice as far as Tahoe from my home, but then I remembered I-80 on a winter weekend and realized this far drive was well worth it.

1735507432845.png

An aerial view of Mammoth Mountain from 2023 shows snow-filled homes and condominiums built alongside the ski area.
Mario Tama/Getty Images

I’m now in my second month of splitting time between Mammoth and San Francisco, and I couldn’t imagine the idea of planning another Tahoe weekend. There’s no getting around the fact that it takes a lot of time to get here, but I can leave San Francisco on Sundays and go against the normal Tahoe snow crowds and rarely hit traffic.

And when I get to Mammoth, it feels like I’ve left the rest of California behind. I take the free bus to the grocery store and the ski hill. The locals are friendly and welcoming. The tourists, who predominantly seem to come from Los Angeles or San Diego, are jubilant and just happy to be here, unlike Tahoe, where tourists are as fussy as a tech bro who regrets buying a Cybertruck.


1735507741862.png

1735507758409.png

Mammoth's free shuttle bus, Gondola and slopes at Mammoth.

That positive mood seems to spread to the mountain itself, like the Angelenos have brought beach vibes to the Eastern Sierra. People are always starting conversations on lift rides up the mountain, sharing tips on where the best skiing is and what’s fun in town. And the skiing terrain is excellent, with huge steep faces above treeline, powder-filled tree runs spread around the lower mountain and the biggest terrain park in California.

There are certainly crowds at Mammoth, the town estimates 1.3 million people visit every winter, but the mountain’s natural symmetry with a wide ski area built around a single peak rising over 11,000 feet above sea level allows crowds to easily spread out across the mountain. Dave McCoy, the founder of Mammoth who died at age 104 in 2020, clearly made an excellent decision when he decided to set up a rope tow in what was then the middle of nowhere.

Mammoth is owned by Alterra, the same mega-company that owns Palisades in Tahoe, but the company appears to have better ideas in Mammoth, where at least it has yet to build a gondola to nowhere. And Mammoth’s management channels the ski area’s crowds into legitimately cool things, like an apres-skiing dance party that draws a massive crowd every weekend (and has public transit so you can party without driving in the snow).


1735507624333.png

Mammoth’s natural symmetry with a wide ski area built around a single peak allows crowds to easily spread out across the mountain to areas like Chair 12.
Lester Black/SFGATE

I can already hear locals in Truckee celebrating my decision to give up on Tahoe. That sentiment isn’t unique. Mountain locals across America think city people like me should stay out of the mountains. But the truth is my departure won’t solve the gridlock. For every San Franciscan like me who gives up on Tahoe, there will be another person trying to make it work. I’m just happy that person is no longer me.
 
Last edited:
There is no question I see encounter more skiers from NorCal at Mammoth recently. I've attributed that to Ikon combined with the lure of Mammoth when conditions are much better than Tahoe: late season and early seasons like this one where there's a problem with the rain/snow line at Tahoe.

I don't get specific numbers anymore, but a Mammoth employee told me last week that 2022-23 did not break Mammoth's attendance record, mainly due to too much snow and thus too many days of restricted operation, a scenario I had observed before in 1982-83. So the lift system that handled the record skier numbers in 2004-05 and 2005-06 is more than capable of handling current crowds with some capacity upgrades since then.
Mammoth’s natural symmetry with a wide ski area built around a single peak allows crowds to easily spread out across the mountain
The key factor here is that there are 6 widely spread out access points to the mountain at Mammoth vs. the massive single cluster at the base of Palisades. That's the luck of topography though the free bus service helps too.
Seattle has four ski resorts within two hours of the city, including one just 50 miles away on an interstate that rarely shuts down, making it possible to work a full-time job in the city and still ski your face off.
Crystal and Stevens have quite severe parking issues on the weekends, reservation now required in some cases I think. Lack of ski capacity in the PNW relative to an expanding skier population is a live issue as expounded by this blog.

I have little sense personally of Tahoe's situation as my own skiing there has been erratic and infrequent since I got involved with Iron Blosam in Utah in 1996. Tseeb seems to be managing OK at Tahoe though he also is retired with his own place there and generally avoids weekends/holidays.
 
I spent five days in the Tahoe basin last March. It was right after a big ~40" storm and all roads in the area were still pretty messed up. We arrived at Alpine Meadows on Monday afternoon and skied in the tail end of the stormy weather, windy and low viz with some weird crusty surfaces. Tuesday and Wed were outstanding partly sunny, loose powder days. Crowds were very acceptable, with only a big line here and there, not everywhere. I got the sense that P-T is quite a bit more manageable on weekdays rather than weekends. We had a guide and I had a great time both days. It was only my second time at Palisades and I loved the terrain. Did some runs with @tseeb .


Thursday was a planned day at Diamond Peak that was great fun in low crowds and scenic conditions. Friday we tried to ski at Alpine Meadows, but were foiled by a massive power failure. Rather than wait for a reopening that could take hours we drove back to Diamond Peak again and did a half day, then made the return drive to our originating point, Salt Lake City.
 
Wouldn’t the writer have to battle the traffic out of the Bay area to get to Mammoth anyway?
That was my thought but he said:
I can leave San Francisco on Sundays and go against the normal Tahoe snow crowds and rarely hit traffic.
So it sounds like he's no longer skiing weekends, which makes somewhat of an apples-to-oranges comparison. Tseeb's experience and jimk's comments above led me to believe that Tahoe is usually manageable midweek.

Mammoth is not known for bargain lodging prices, so I think the author got lucky there and I'm reluctant to draw conclusions about that.

Where the author is right:
1) Traffic. Our drive from LA is ~5 hours on cruise control and rarely weather impacted until you are almost at Mammoth. Most of my worst winter driving horror stories are from Tahoe and many years ago. Both I-80 and US50 can be nightmares during big Sierra dumps.
2) Skier demand. As noted Mammoth's lift system evolved to handle the record crowds which first were there in 1982 and 1986 before 2005 and 2006 and are concentrated on weekends. I suspect the Bay Area skier population is growing, though perhaps not at the same rate as Salt Lake, Denver and Seattle. There is zero evidence either at Mammoth or the SoCal locals that SoCal's skier population is growing at all vs. even the 1980's.

It is more evident in the past 20 years of my detail record keeping that Mammoth often has better snow conditions than anywhere in Tahoe, even Kirkwood which by the numbers should be better.

For terrain quality and variety I think Tahoe is the best regional group of ski areas in North America, a cut above Utah or I-70 Colorado. "Secondary areas" like Mt. Rose and Sugar Bowl have some very interesting terrain.
 
I'm planning to go to Kirkwood Thursday and Friday, after spending NYE and NYD with my wife. (Maybe on NYD we'll take our dog to the coast for a walk on the beach and bring birthday present to friend who lives along Soquel Creek in Capitola and limes from our tree to his wife who is a Thai chef.) I already made reservations - first time ever, for free but not great parking at Kirkwood who used to fill all their lots on busiest mornings and have to turn people away.

The good thing for me going to Kirkwood, assuming the Carson Spur is not closed due to snow or avalanche, is that I avoid going through Sacramento which has traffic approaching it after 6 AM on weekdays and from it to skiing on weekends. I had too many people on my drive on Sat. Nov. 30 using the right lane in I-80 to pass traffic going 65-70 in the fast lane, then forcing their way back in before hitting slow trucks and spraying gravel at me. I'd like to think they all had medical or other emergencies but think most were just dicks going to Palisades. I was early enough to not have traffic slowdown on CA-89 going to Alpine, but after skiing got stuck behind slow (and generally clueless) tourists going down the W side of Tahoe.

I was going to ask @Tony Crocker where I should ski the upcoming Saturday and Sunday. My inexpensive Senior Tahoe Epic (~$450) pass is blacked out all Saturdays at Kirkwood so my choices are Heavenly, Palisades (where I'd have to make free parking reservation on Tues and would work best if I could stay with Truckee friend a night or two (or three), or Mammoth, where I be trying to sneak into hot tub after skiing and take a shower there afterwards then sleep in SUV on Scenic Route before going to Old New York Bakery for breakfast. Too bad there in no Early Up with free breakfast that I day-tripped from South Tahoe for on Dec. 1. Heavenly can be OK on Sat. with early start when in full operation, but only free parking is in NV and with Comet lift down and lowest CA level not yet open this year, there will be hard to avoid bottlenecks.
 
The trend of Sierra storms with rain/snow line within the ski terrain continues. Palisades upper/lower snowfall numbers are 131 inches vs. 34 inches, a huge red flag for lots of rain below 7,000 feet. Heavenly reports a low tide 18-20 inch base on 75 inches upper mountain snowfall. It's obvious Mammoth will have much better conditions in addition to the better logistics on the weekend. I'm not sure why tseeb as a retiree wouldn't wait until after Jan. 5 to ski next, especially at Tahoe. We plan to ski another 2-3 days at Mammoth the week of Jan. 6 assuming my back has settled down.

First half of January looks dry for the Sierra per OpenSnow, another argument favoring Mammoth's superior snow preservation.

Meanwhile here in SoCal, there will be the least ski terrain open at New Year's in over 40 years. Dry is not uncommon here, but evidently it has rarely been cold enough to make snow. This seems odd, as December 2024 temps in Los Angeles have been a degree or two below the 2000-2019 average.
 
Last edited:
This morning Bryan at OpenSnow says Tahoe will get its last storm for awhile on Friday. This one will be similar to others in December with rain/snow line starting out around 8,000 feet.
 
Figured I’d chime in after a long break from posting since I have a lot of both Tahoe and Mammoth experience (been living in the Bay since 2018).

I personally prefer Mammoth to Palisades, but much of that is down to knowing Mammoth better and enjoying high speed wind buff on open terrain over technical steeps. I also appreciate the lack of powder competition at Mammoth vs. Palisades. I have friends who complain that Mammoth is too flat/lacks technical terrain, and that is at least partly true vs Palisades and Kirkwood.

Tahoe is a logistical headache with the road closures and traffic. Sure, the drive is often shorter than LA to Mammoth, but it’s always more stressful and it can get significantly worse. Like Tony, I got used to the LA to Mammoth drive. Just gotta stock up on good podcasts. The one plus of the shorter drive is that I can feasibly do day trips on non-storm days, which is helpful in my current phase of life.

Tahoe’s logistics have only gotten worse with parking reservations (Palisades and Kirkwood). You need to make those reservations on the Tuesday before the weekend, which is too early to know if you’d want to ski at Alpine (higher base for the frequent rain/snow storms) vs Olympic Valley (KT and Red Dog are generally open on high wind days when there’s not much worth skiing at Alpine). The Base 2 Base gondola is pointless beyond serving as a scenic seat for a pocket lunch and never runs. The KT section can’t be operated separately to increase uphill capacity during storms and the ski racks don’t fit modern skis. Truly the worst $65M lift upgrade imaginable. I haven’t been to Kirkwood since their reservation system went live, but you’re basically looking at an extra $20 per day.

Re: the article, some points are valid. Mammoth’s bus system is great vs. anything in Tahoe. But the general premise that having a ski house and a flexible work schedule that allows for off-peak travel is superior to the weekend warrior lifestyle is obvious and is separate from the Tahoe vs. Mammoth debate.
 
Weekdays in Tahoe are fine. It's really the weekends that are the issue - Friday night/Sat AM arrivals and Sunday departures. Not only do you have the skier traffic, but the Sacramento suburban sprawl traffic on I-80 from downtown for 40 miles to the Sierra foothills of Auburn is equally bad.

I have often tried to leave on Thursday nights or Friday nights at 9 pm. Return on Sundays after dinner in Truckee at around 8 pm or Monday if possible.

Now, I will only do one 3-day weekend in Tahoe. Occasionally, I am motivated to take a day trip to SugarBowl - or sometimes Sierra-at-Tahoe. Sugar Bowl's expert terrain is almost as extensive as Alpine Meadow's.

However, traffic, parking reservations, etc., can take the fun out of Tahoe skiing. I instead use money that would be allocated to an IKON Pass, Ski Share, and commuting for a trip to a new destination.

Vacationers should feel free to enjoy Tahoe. Mostly, they will not encounter too many issues - especially if coming from the Reno airport.

The grind from the Bay Area becomes trying after a few weekends.
 
It is more evident in the past 20 years of my detail record keeping that Mammoth often has better snow conditions than anywhere in Tahoe, even Kirkwood which by the numbers should be better.
Is Kirkwood snowfall declining? Can we blame it on Vail?:) Heavenly did a lot worse than Kirkwood last season and Vail has owned it longer:)

Or is climate change affecting Sierra Crest SW of Tahoe more than NW of Tahoe?

Using numbers from @Tony Crocker for last and current season:
Note that he lists Kirkwood as Kirkwood (Carson Pass), Calif. 8,526
Ski Area Elevation Snowfall % of Normal
Palisades 8,000 421 99
Kirkwood 8,526 368 80
Heavenly 10,000 226 60
This season as of Dec. 24
Palisades 8,000 109 104
Kirkwood 8,526 80 67
Heavenly 10,000 63 65

Current season numbers from OpenSnow Dec. 30 post:
Palisades 139 110
Kirkwood 104 82
Heavenly 81 82
Sierra-at-Tahoe 66 55 (They may have not reported snowfall until they opened in Dec.)

The trend of Sierra storms with rain/snow line within the ski terrain continues. Palisades upper/lower snowfall numbers are 131 inches vs. 34 inches, a huge red flag for lots of rain below 7,000 feet. Heavenly reports a low tide 18-20 inch base on 75 inches upper mountain snowfall. It's obvious Mammoth will have much better conditions in addition to the better logistics on the weekend. I'm not sure why tseeb as a retiree wouldn't wait until after Jan. 5 to ski next, especially at Tahoe. We plan to ski another 2-3 days at Mammoth the week of Jan. 6 assuming my back has settled down.
I wanted to go again as soon as possible, but I suppose it does not matter much if I have a 29 day break between my last skiing on 12/3 or a 32 day break if I go back to Kirkwood on Sun 1/5. While it would be nice to have another day or two to put away limited Christmas decorations I put up and to work on yard, I told friend who let my wife and I stay at his family's place in the England's Lake District and led us on great hikes there in Sept. I'd be there on Thurs as will he.

I tried to make free parking reservation for Sunday (the last day until the following Sat. you need reservation) and they are "SOLD OUT" as was Palisades. I could always go to my friend's KW place and walk down his road, then up main road into ski area or call a shuttle to pick me up at his place or arrive after noon when reservations are no longer required. I've parked at his place before when they were turning everyone around due to full parking, but that was on day with enough snow to ski down his road. Since I'm leaving later in January for a week in Puerto Vallarta to celebrate our 35th anniversary, I'd like to get 5 or 6 days this trip.
 
Is Kirkwood snowfall declining?
There is no reason to believe that. This season so far has some anomalies. The storm before Thanksgiving hit Mammoth more than Tahoe, and combined with the 19 inches a week later gave Mammoth a base that can hold up for at least another month even if January is dry. The December storms have favored NW of the lake and all of the storms had a higher than optimal rain/snow line.

When I say "by the numbers" for Kirkwood I mean both the high snowfall (mid-Kirkwood average snowfall is comparable to Palisades upper) and the elevation range which should mean better preservation and rain resistance. Yet I now have data back to 1997 and Kirkwood's percents of terrain open lag Mammoth's in December and that's really a big gap since Mammoth has twice as much terrain.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like he may have ended up in the old cabin my college ski team used to rent. There's more than a few old A-frames still up there, but this one was a classic.

Meanwhile here in SoCal, there will be the least ski terrain open at New Year's in over 40 years. Dry is not uncommon here, but evidently it has rarely been cold enough to make snow. This seems odd, as December 2024 temps in Los Angeles have been a degree or two below the 2000-2019 average.
I suspect that cool weather has been driven by the marine layer. I can't remember a fall or early winter with this much fog near the coast. The pattern this year seems to be storms completely missing SoCal by just enough to keep the Sierra near average while preventing the cold inside sliders that really let snowmaking expand terrain.
 
I suspect that cool weather has been driven by the marine layer. I can't remember a fall or early winter with this much fog near the coast.
That's an interesting insight. Even in Glendale we have seen a lot of that overcast. That's a more common spring pattern, and the inland areas are much warmer in the spring.
 
Back
Top