Throughout the history of FTO we've eschewed the obligatory resort rankings list that seemingly every other ski publication tallies. Why? Well, for one thing it's incredibly subjective (see Crocker's recent musings/ramblings/rantings on skier ignorance as a prime example). For another, so-called reader rankings released by other pubs are rife with ballot box-stuffing corruption by resorts from coast to coast. If you need a third reason, it's because you Liftlines users would shred the list to smithereens. Yeah, you're that good. Give yourselves a hearty pat on the back for screwing with my livelihood.
However, along comes a list today from Forbes. What criteria did they use? Not snowfall, not lifts, not customer service, not accessibility... not even who serves the best ski town appletini to Muffy and Biff in their sequined Bogners and fur lined Moon Boots. Instead they used PAF, or Pure Awesomeness Factor. Forbes has a sense of humor, who knew? And besides, I can't think of a better unit of measurement than PAF.
The Top 10 Ski Resorts in the United States for 2013
http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopher ... -for-2013/
Go on, now, tear it to sheds. I know you can. Yeah, you're that good.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
However, along comes a list today from Forbes. What criteria did they use? Not snowfall, not lifts, not customer service, not accessibility... not even who serves the best ski town appletini to Muffy and Biff in their sequined Bogners and fur lined Moon Boots. Instead they used PAF, or Pure Awesomeness Factor. Forbes has a sense of humor, who knew? And besides, I can't think of a better unit of measurement than PAF.
The Top 10 Ski Resorts in the United States for 2013
http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopher ... -for-2013/
Go on, now, tear it to sheds. I know you can. Yeah, you're that good.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2