Whistler,Blackcomb BC Jan.14 & 15

Anthony

New member
The oldest kid in the family is working as a instructor at Whistler so we decided to pay a visit .Now we know booking skiing advance is a roll of the dice so did not have our hopes up. Before leaving , received the news that it rained top to bottom just last week after a snowfall,sound familiar. Anyway ,of we went . Driving up to the hill ,the country side had the familiar eastern look with frozen over melted snowbanks along the road under grey skies. Once in the village ,a quick check of the snowbanks confirmed what i thought ,frozen granular .

Jan 14 Clear skies and temps just above freezing. Over 90% of runs listed as open ,not that you could ski them as frozen ski tracks were everywhere off groomed trails. with clear skies and a warm sun ,we salvaged the day by skiing steep bowls that were taking in direct sunlight softening up the snow. Basically a spring day. Overall a good day despite limited options.

Jan. 15. No sun with thick overcast and reduced visibility. High alpine bowls in fog and cloud were off the table as skiers made there way down following the markers along the cat tracks skiing over frozen granular and ice . Very eastern type of experience as too many skiers funnelled on to the same trails scraping away and holding a edge while sliding sideways. Gave up on the upper mountain and headed to the mid mountain to find the same experience as once again only blues available with too many skiers merged on to the runs. By midday fog and snow mixed with sleet made the visibility almost nil. Became concerned of being taken out by another skier and called it a day as only groomer blues on the table. Skied down to the lower mountain where it was pouring rain-wow.

Jan 16. Heading out, rain in the valley ,6 inches of new snow up on the mountain. Will see what it is like.
 
I don't recall a TR from Whistler here, ever. Considering it is rated the No 1 resort by the readers of one magazine, that seems even odder.

My one time there was an early Dec visit that coincided with a big cold storm and my memories are all positive. Which is what it all comes down to for how impressions are formed, often. And seeing how Utah's storms seem to deliver much more in March April than in November or January -- Whistler, on the other hand, seems to get it early and big.

Anyway, my condolences.
 
It's one of the few major places I have yet to ski, but that's largely because I really don't have much of a desire to.
 
JAN. 16 -Day Three on the mountain and a game saver . Started out in the village this morning under grey skies and drizzle and thoughts of a great day seamed absurd . Report said six inches up on the mountain but no sign of this in the village. Loaded up on the lift and headed up as skies started to clear. Getting off the lift and what do you know ,six inches of dry snow . The six inches opened everything up as the base is at 4 feet so six inches goes a long way for a snow starved eastern skier. Did laps in the new snow while waiting for the bowls to open. Bowls were in great shape when they opened as six inches of windblown snow and hardpack but at least you got ski all over. High alpine glades were the top choice for us as deep untracked snow could be found for hours . After a long day headed back down to the village where the snow on the way down became very wet and damp. Very mild in the village with very warm temps way above the freezing mark and melting snow banks.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF4148.jpg
    DSCF4148.jpg
    238.6 KB · Views: 6,721
  • DSCF4249.jpg
    DSCF4249.jpg
    289.9 KB · Views: 6,694
  • DSCF4240.jpg
    DSCF4240.jpg
    111.3 KB · Views: 6,706
Whistler's long term reliability track record is quite impressive. Extended droughts are very rare, something we Californians can certainly appreciate. Top-to-bottom rain events are fairly rare, probably a couple of times per season. And when they do happen, you usually do not have to wait too long before the surface is restored by fresh snow, as illustrated here. 2005 was the very rare case of an extended drought following a major top-to-bottom rain event.

Evren":383q9aon said:
I don't recall a TR from Whistler here, ever.
viewtopic.php?t=881
viewtopic.php?t=6240
viewtopic.php?t=6241
viewtopic.php?t=6242
viewtopic.php?t=6244

Unfortunately there are not that many regular FTO posters anymore, and only a handful of us travel much.
Admin":383q9aon said:
It's one of the few major places I have yet to ski, but that's largely because I really don't have much of a desire to.
I would normally :brick: at a comment like this about what IMHO is the #2 ski destination in North America. But when the commenter lives 20+ minutes from #1, I sort of understand. But not completely, as I'm not the type who wants to ski exclusively at the same place, even if it is #1.
 
Glad to see that things have improved for Anthony.

Tony Crocker":6vlpecvs said:
I'm not the type who wants to ski exclusively at the same place, even if it is #1.
I suspect that I'm similar to Tony in this issue, but the only way I'd find out for sure is to move near one of my Top Tens, which unfortunately ain't going to happen in this lifetime. :-( That said, before he moved to SLC, given his previous ten years as a skiing road warrior (mostly out of necessity), who woulda thunk that Admin would become such a homebody?
 
jamesdeluxe":25135q8h said:
Glad to see that things have improved for Anthony.

Tony Crocker":25135q8h said:
I'm not the type who wants to ski exclusively at the same place, even if it is #1.
I suspect that I'm similar to Tony in this issue, but the only way I'd find out for sure is to move near one of my Top Tens, which unfortunately ain't going to happen in this lifetime. :-( That said, before he moved to SLC, given his previous ten years as a skiing road warrior (mostly out of necessity), who woulda thunk that Admin would become such a homebody?
I'm definitely willing to travel, as will be the case in a week or two. But I've definitely become more of a homey. My impression of Whistler is that it's a bit too developed for my taste.
 
jamesdeluxe":3to9go2p said:
I suspect that I'm similar to Tony in this issue, but the only way I'd find out for sure is to move near one of my Top Tens, which unfortunately ain't going to happen in this lifetime. :-(
Well with that attitude, it's guaranteed. Like Warren says, if you don't do it now, you'll just be another year older when you do. People who say they can't move and have to stay where they are, are living with self-imposed shackles.

Admin":3to9go2p said:
My impression of Whistler is that it's a bit too developed for my taste.
You're wrong. That's really only just the village.
 
Back home after a quick trip to the west. Overall decent trip ,wish we had more time as with only 3 days of skiing only had time to scratch the surface of what Whistler has to offer with their over 8000 acres of skiing. Yes,Whistler is commercial but the village can be avoided and you can loose yourself in the skiing. Old timer on the hill told me worst start in forty years . Told our kid hang in there ,you will have your powder days in between the instructor days. Snow in the forecast tonight and tomorrow.
 
6 Hours on the aircraft to Vancouver, 30 minutes in the terminal followed by a 2 hour bus ride. On the return 5 hours in the air. Add the usual wait time sitting in the air terminal waiting for departure.
 
The village at Whistler is Disney, full stop. I'd rather have the bro-bro atmosphere of Brighton, even, than that.
And if I was to drive up north, something like Whitewater or even Kicking Horse and Revelstoke (never been) would be on my list before Whistler.
Having said all that, you can't deny the acreage at Whistler.
 
Evren":35nyg51y said:
The village at Whistler is Disney, full stop. I'd rather have the bro-bro atmosphere of Brighton, even, than that.
It's shops, restaurants, and hotels. How is that Disney? Vail, Whistler, Zermatt - I can't tell the difference walking around save for the languages and price points (with Zermatt at the high end of the cost scale by far). Regarding Brighton, the best thing that can happen to that place would be to bulldoze all those moth-eaten buildings from the 50's, 60'a and 70's - especially the horrific A-frames - and replace it with a real base village.
 
Marc_C":j3e7wq68 said:
Regarding Brighton, the best thing that can happen to that place would be to bulldoze all those moth-eaten buildings from the 50's, 60'a and 70's - especially the horrific A-frames - and replace it with a real base village.

I rather like Molly Brown's! I think their newer buildings have far less character.
 
Haven't been to Zermatt. Bu Vail and Whistler are similar in that they've been designed to look like an Alpine village. It's like sex, sometimes the stupidest thing ruins the mood.
 
I have skied both Revelstoke (as recently as yesterday) and Whistler/Blackcomb a lot.

Revelstoke is not in the same league as W/B. I can't see hitting Revelstoke day after day for a week, much less a season. W/B is a resort you can ski for a season.

Whitewater? Over W/B? No way.

The W/B base village is in fact Disney (read Downhill Slide for the whole argument) but once you are on the hill it is not a minus. In fact, it can be fun.

Buy a Southwest ticket to Seattle so you can make last minute changes and ski W/B at least once.
 
You may be right. I am speaking from a few days here and there (Whitewater and Whistler) but repeated visits is something else altogether. Still, Whitewater was a pleasant surprise, before any exposure to the gems of Utah (Snowbasin).
 
Back
Top