Whiteface March 6, 2010

Powderqueen

New member
The Slides at Whiteface aren't open very often. In 2008 I was lucky enough to ski them for the first time. They didn't open last year and they would not have opened this past week if it wasn't for that big dump we got last week.

The Slides are pretty exciting skiing. They are wild and gnarly and they require skiers to use all their skills.

It was a cold morning so we didn't go for a super early start, though we did get on the snow before 10. We packed up lunch and beer in a backpack, so our first run was down to Wilderness to drop off our sustenance at the mid mountain lodge.

At this point I got a text from Chuck who said they just opened the slides, so up we went.

IMG_1464.jpg


Our first run was Slide 3, since it was still early and this #3 seems to get the most sun. We climbed up and traversed over and came upon a group of young guys, some skiers, some snowboarders clogging up the entrance of Slide 3. One of them couldn't keep his ski on his ski boot. His friends took off and left him as we watched he and his skis and poles slide down the first narrow chutes into Slide 3. Mark offered to help and noticed his 15+ year old skis were set at a DIN of 5. He said he hadn't had them checked in 10 years (when he was probably a child), and now he weighed 200lbs and 6 feet tall. Mark adjusted them and it enabled him to get down.

Once we got past this guy, Slide 3 opened up nicely


IMG_1452.jpg



Slide 2 is kind of amorphic and has a lot of small trees and tight squeezes.

IMG_1454.jpg


Mark at the bottom of Slide 2

IMG_1457.jpg



Slide 1 is the most wide open and has some nice soft snow


IMG_1459.jpg



Slide 1 also has a huge waterfall, which was quite tricky to maneuver and required mandatory air.


IMG_1462.jpg



Slide 4 was our favorite. There's a tricky traverse over slides 1, 2 and 3. Slide 4 starts off pretty open with some soft sweet turns.

Mark dropping into slide 4


IMG_1469.jpg




Half way down it narrows down considerably.

Mark in the narrows.


IMG_1474.jpg



We pick our way down though tight trees and blind turns and then we come a horizon line.


Slide 4 waterfall

IMG_1476.jpg




We did 4 runs in the slides between 10:30-2pm and were ready to crack a beer and eat some lunch at Mid Mountain.


IMG_1478.jpg




After lunch we decided to head over to Lookout Mountain to check out the new terrain.

Wilmington Trail


IMG_1481.jpg



Lookout Below had big soft bumps and was a lot of fun


IMG_1483.jpg



This sign made us very sad since it was 3pm when we got there.


IMG_1488.jpg




The Sugar Valley glade looked pretty awesome and we were greatly disappointed to have missed it.

The day flew by and the lifts close at an early 3:30. The Cloudspin deck was rockin, but we by-passed the deck party for a tailgate with our own beer, snacks and lawn chairs.

Whiteface is an incredible mountain that has kept me challenged ever since I've been there. My best days there have been in the spring when the sun was shining and the temps were over 32. It can be a tough mountain mid-winter and when it snows, usually the wind blows. I think I will likely continue the Whiteface pilgrimage in the spring for years to come.
 
Powderqueen":1m7blxh8 said:
The Slides are pretty exciting skiing. They are wild and gnarly and they require skiers to use all their skills.
They are a ton of fun. And by the looks of it you got it while the getting was good! =D> =D> =D>
Powderqueen":1m7blxh8 said:
The Sugar Valley glade looked pretty awesome and we were greatly disappointed to have missed it.

They were pretty fun, and certainly help give the mountain some more protected areas when the wind really picks up. Next year the entire glade system opens to almost the top of lookout. It should really be nice to have such an extensive tree area at WF. If it is anything like the bottom part (which I skied earlier) it should be wonderful. I heard it should be steeper than the bottom part so that should be an added bonus.
 
Powderqueen":fy0oa6o6 said:
Whiteface is an incredible mountain that has kept me challenged ever since I've been there.

IMHO, Whiteface is one of the best mountains in the east coast. Especially, when it snows and doesn't blow.
Powderqueen":fy0oa6o6 said:
My best days there have been in the spring when the sun was shining and the temps were over 32. It can be a tough mountain mid-winter and when it snows, usually the wind blows.
I think the best time of the year to hit it is in the spring when it softens up. Indeed, I thnk Whiteface is the best spring mountain in EC.
 
Powderqueen":1s0hmqm1 said:
This sign made us very sad since it was 3pm when we got there.

The Sugar Valley glade looked pretty awesome and we were greatly disappointed to have missed it.

Looks can be deceiving, I was there yesterday and having seen that they closed at 2:30pm, opted to try them out. Besides the first drop, the glades is a long traverses with little fall line skiing. There is also another negative, it wasn't clean up after it was cut. There were a log cut logs in the trail. :roll:

So I give that glade before the Slides... The slides had been shutdown when we got at the top at 1pm. Mind you, i've skied the slides a few times before, so...it wasn't that bad.

rfarren":1s0hmqm1 said:
I thnk Whiteface is the best spring mountain in EC.
Although I regard WF hightly, I wouldn't say it's the best Spring mountain in the EC. There are a few others that are equally fun and great which standout in the Spring time.
 
I went to Gore on Sunday, and we had super spring conditions and plenty of beautiful glades with soft corn snow. I believe it was better than Whiteface without the Slides and the meager glades they do have. Bummer about the logs and such.

We took our friends with us who are from Lake Placid and mostly ski at WF even though their passes are good at both Gore and WF. They were hugely impressed with the skiing we did and thoroughly enjoyed Gore more than WF.

Typically, they go to WF and do 3-4 runs and call it a day. We kept them out until the last lift ride at 4pm! They loved it and probably skied more runs at Gore on Sunday than they did at WF all season!
 
Patrick":vumo5tvi said:
Looks can be deceiving, I was there yesterday and having seen that they closed at 2:30pm, opted to try them out. Besides the first drop, the glades is a long traverses which little fall line skiing. There is also another negative, it wasn't clean up after it was cut. There were a log cut logs in the trail. :roll:

So I give that glade before the Slides... The slides had been shutdown when we got at the top at 1pm. Mind you, i've skied the slides a few times before, so...it wasn't that bad.

When I skied there earlier this winter it was the day it opened, or the day afterwards, so there was plenty of fresh left. Maybe that had to do with my opinion of them. Next year you will be able to acces them from close to the top of the wilmington trail. That should make them much more extensive and also provide more sustained steep fall line skiing. As it is now, you access the glades from very near where the wilmington trail ends.
 
Powderqueen":1s4d550y said:
I went to Gore on Sunday, and we had super spring conditions and plenty of beautiful glades with soft corn snow. I believe it was better than Whiteface without the Slides and the meager glades they do have.

My only issue with gore is the layout and sustained vert. Whiteface is one of the few mountains in the EC where you can really get your legs burning. I like fast GS turns so trail like Cloudspin and Skyward make me happy.
 
rfarren":4gbpuy22 said:
Powderqueen":4gbpuy22 said:
I went to Gore on Sunday, and we had super spring conditions and plenty of beautiful glades with soft corn snow. I believe it was better than Whiteface without the Slides and the meager glades they do have.

My only issue with gore is the layout and sustained vert. Whiteface is one of the few mountains in the EC where you can really get your legs burning. I like fast GS turns so trail like Cloudspin and Skyward make me happy.

We never got to ski Skyward and Cloudspin this trip. We were in the slides for 4 hours, then lunch, then Lookout and the day was done.

Gore does have a funky layout, but the mountain itself has some very interesting terrain, big boulders and such. I actually prefer shorter glade skiing than the big 3000' vert...but that's just me. Remember, my usual hill is barely 750 vert...so skiing 1000 vert at a time is just fine. 3000' is fun once in a while, but burns me out pretty fast.

Right now Acidchrist is at Snowbasin skiing the big vert at mach speed like it's his last day of his life on skis. He just texted me to tell me that.
 
Powderqueen":21it3df2 said:
Right now Acidchrist is at Snowbasin skiing the big vert at mach speed like it's his last day of his life on skis.

Interesting, because he was looking pretty wiped last night.
 
Admin":1hx554ey said:
Powderqueen":1hx554ey said:
Right now Acidchrist is at Snowbasin skiing the big vert at mach speed like it's his last day of his life on skis.

Interesting, because he was looking pretty wiped last night.

He recovers pretty fast and is an animal when he's out there with his buddies in the testosterone cloud.
 
Powderqueen":adqe7njs said:
Admin":adqe7njs said:
Powderqueen":adqe7njs said:
Right now Acidchrist is at Snowbasin skiing the big vert at mach speed like it's his last day of his life on skis.

Interesting, because he was looking pretty wiped last night.

He recovers pretty fast and is an animal when he's out there with his buddies in the testosterone cloud.

He just texted that he's done 18,000 vertical before lunch. That's only 6 or 7 runs?
 
Powderqueen":r7mdhelq said:
Gore does have a funky layout, but the mountain itself has some very interesting terrain, big boulders and such. I actually prefer shorter glade skiing than the big 3000' vert...but that's just me. Remember, my usual hill is barely 750 vert...so skiing 1000 vert at a time is just fine. 3000' is fun once in a while, but burns me out pretty fast.

Right now Acidchrist is at Snowbasin skiing the big vert at mach speed like it's his last day of his life on skis. He just texted me to tell me that.

My father likes to count his vert ever since I bought one of those fancy altitude tracking watches. I think in 06' before I got him the watch we did some 45,000 feet before lunch at Alta. If remember right, it was a low snow year and the snow was firm. So we did laps on collins trying to see how many feet of vert we could get. The liftees were pretty impressed everytime we came down. I think we got to around 80,000 or so before the day ended. Our legs got tired from just speeding down as fast as possible and we ended up slowing down as the day wore on.

A couple years back at Whiteface I think we got about 80,000 or 85,000 feet in a day. We avoided the summit and just did laps off the Gondola. It was an empty day, and we never waited for a line. I think we rode the gondola some 30 times that day, and went bell to bell.
 
rfarren":3l5ru7at said:
Powderqueen":3l5ru7at said:
Gore does have a funky layout, but the mountain itself has some very interesting terrain, big boulders and such. I actually prefer shorter glade skiing than the big 3000' vert...but that's just me. Remember, my usual hill is barely 750 vert...so skiing 1000 vert at a time is just fine. 3000' is fun once in a while, but burns me out pretty fast.

Right now Acidchrist is at Snowbasin skiing the big vert at mach speed like it's his last day of his life on skis. He just texted me to tell me that.

My father likes to count his vert ever since I bought one of those fancy altitude tracking watches. I think in 06' before I got him the watch we did some 45,000 feet before lunch at Alta. If remember right, it was a low snow year and the snow was firm. So we did laps on collins trying to see how many feet of vert we could get. The liftees were pretty impressed everytime we came down. I think we got to around 80,000 or so before the day ended. Our legs got tired from just speeding down as fast as possible and we ended up slowing down as the day wore on.

A couple years back at Whiteface I think we got about 80,000 or 85,000 feet in a day. We avoided the summit and just did laps off the Gondola. It was an empty day, and we never waited for a line. I think we rode the gondola some 30 times that day, and went bell to bell.

Those are incredible numbers. I didn't think anyone could really do close to 40 runs off Collins. 5+ runs per hour is pretty impressive.
 
rfarren":2c7a9ayv said:
A couple years back at Whiteface I think we got about 80,000 or 85,000 feet in a day. We avoided the summit and just did laps off the Gondola. It was an empty day, and we never waited for a line. I think we rode the gondola some 30 times that day, and went bell to bell.

:bs: :-o

Really? Not that I'm doubting it, but I think that a 80k or 85k riding the gondola at WF is unlikely.

To reach 80k you would need 33 runs in one day.

33 ride up the gondola would last 6 hours 40 minutes. Let's say you get on the first gondola at 8:30am. Riding it the equivalent to 33 times, you would have to ride it continuously until 3:10pm. Last gondola is at 3:30pm, so that would give you more or less 20 minutes to ski 33 runs - that would leave you less than one minutes to ski a 2,452 vertical feet run from the top of Little Whiteface to the base. No room for breaks (toilet or other). And all that is only for 80k.
 
How do you guys keep track of all this stuff :-) , hard enough keeping track on how many times out on the boards .
 
Personally I have found a gatorade bottle on the chair lift work better than Jason's suggestions, but we digress...
:hijack:
Great trip report PDQ, thanks for posting those pics of the slides. I have never been able to time a WF visit with the slides being open, and it may be slipping away from me again this year as it appears they weren't open as of today. I may have to enjoy them vicariously for another year.
 
jasoncapecod":5bl9bra9 said:
Rob, with all that none stop skiing. Do you guys were a diaper or insert a catheter ????

Didn't have to go. I think we did the gondola at least 20 some odd times. It was only skiing, no stopping. We didn't bother with the summit. I think the gondola take about 12 minutes, although the website says it takes 15 I think that 12 if not less is more on the ball. I'll have to ask my father but for some reason I think he said 80k. It could've been less.

I think we racked more vert in Alta because it's a straighter shot from the top of collins down to the base. I don't know why we did it, but it was fun, and it sorta gathered a life of it's own.
 
rfarren":27iuglv6 said:
Didn't have to go. I think we did the gondola at least 20 some odd times. It was only skiing, no stopping. We didn't bother with the summit. I think the gondola take about 12 minutes, although the website says it takes 15 I think that 12 if not less is more on the ball. I'll have to ask my father but for some reason I think he said 80k. It could've been less.

I think we racked more vert in Alta because it's a straighter shot from the top of collins down to the base. I don't know why we did it, but it was fun, and it sorta gathered a life of it's own.

If you did the Gondi 20 times then you only did 50k vert. Your father must have not reset his watch that morning. I think 80k is :bs:
 
Back
Top