Whitefish, MT: Jesus Statue

[jamesdeluxe]

Good thing this isn't a problem in Austria, where every mountain has its own Jesus-on-the-cross statue.

Not that it'd keep me up nights, but I agree -- something like that shouldn't be on federal property.

**Updated to include the appropriate linked article** 8-[

 

[Admin]

Good thing this isn't a problem in Austria, where every mountain has its own Jesus-on-the-cross statue.

Not that it'd keep me up nights, but I agree -- something like that shouldn't be on federal property.

That liberal rag...errrrrr, I mean "the paper of record" is a little late on that story:
http://www.firsttracksonline.com/2011/1 ... ki-resort/

Sent from my Android device using Tapatalk

 

[reefuss12]

Why not on Federal land.

 

[Marc_C]

Why not on Federal land.

Because it violates the first amendment of the US Constitution.

 

[reefuss12]

yeah my 1st amendment rights are really being trampled on with the jesus statue. LOL

 

[rfarren]

Why not on Federal land.

Because the constitution doesn't love religious symbols on federal. Personally I don't care, but I really would prefer a super hot woman statue on federal land. I believe that would be constitutionally ok.