berkshireskier
Active member
Accuweather's forecast for upcoming winter. As always, take it with a grain of salt.
http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/s ... -for-c.asp
http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/s ... -for-c.asp
For those of us who cannot remember from year to year, what does all of that mean? (30 second elevator explanation please, not a weather-geek thesis dissertation!).Tony Crocker":2040avpb said:Looks like a standard La Nina forecast to me. FYI JUL/AUG MEI value of -1.81 is the strongest La Nina reading since 1975. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/kla ... table.html
Tony Crocker":4er7ttra said:The MEI "tracks both sea and air temperatures along with wind, pressure and cloud cover across the tropical Pacific. The data is combined and normalized to a monthly value where +1 = one standard deviation above normal (El Nino condition) and -1 = one standard deviation below normal (La Nina condition)."
So 1.81 standard deviations from normal is a lot. But none of this matters much to the Utards. The Wasatch Mts. sit in a mid-latitude range that gets similar amounts of snow in northern trending La Nina years and southern trending El Nino years.
Detail regarding La Nina favored areas: http://webpages.charter.net/tcrocker818/La_Nina.htm
Tony Crocker":2i6s0gk6 said:...FYI JUL/AUG MEI value of -1.81 is the strongest La Nina reading since 1975. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/kla ... table.html
Yes, this is as close to reliable as you can get for a long range forecast. The positive effects of La Nina for PNW and northern Rockies of both U.S. and Canada have been consistent in the past. The season may not be a monster, but the there are NO below average La Nina seasons for the most sensitive areas (Washington State plus Rockies from Jackson to Revelstoke/Sunshine).longshanks":28b86kk3 said:Looks like the start of something good.
mbaydala":qtuk09xh said:Check out this link. It simplifies long range forecasts for those who don't want to read lengthy discussions.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/produc...ason/13_seasonal_outlooks/color/churchill.php
The weather will be.mbaydala":1ey7juv3 said:All in all I look at this forecast to be a pretty positive one.
longshanks":2l5a3n8c said:Tony Crocker":2l5a3n8c said:...FYI JUL/AUG MEI value of -1.81 is the strongest La Nina reading since 1975. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/kla ... table.html
Precisely what I was thinking when I saw that -1.81 value. Looks like the start of something good. I look forward to the October 12th update to see if the AUG/SEP MEI value deepens further
longshanks":i7hf87mk said:longshanks":i7hf87mk said:Tony Crocker":i7hf87mk said:...FYI JUL/AUG MEI value of -1.81 is the strongest La Nina reading since 1975. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/kla ... table.html
Precisely what I was thinking when I saw that -1.81 value. Looks like the start of something good. I look forward to the October 12th update to see if the AUG/SEP MEI value deepens further
The October update came a bit early....http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/klaus.wolter/MEI/table.html
The AUG/SEP MEI value (-1.99) did indeed deepen further and we have to now go back to MAY/JUN & JUL/AUG of 1955 to find a stronger La Nina.
It will be interesting to see if the trend continues and if the November update reveals a new 61 year low