Alta, UT 12/24/11-1/2/12

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Days 15-24: Same as it ever was.

I spent the last 10 days taking a vacation from my normal life. That meant that things here at FTO more or less ground to a halt, too, save for the postings in these forums from our regular readers. Thanks, folks, for keeping things interesting. We've now got a ton of catching up to do.

I spent each of these 10 days skiing at Alta. With the current snow conditions I saw little point in venturing anywhere else. At least we had the holidays. Mira and Sima were visiting from NYC, and mrgskier has been out here with his whole family this week. rdwore is also back in town for the rest of the winter. If we didn't have much snow, at least it was reunion week around here. Our band of misfits gathered at my house for Christmas Eve, AmyZ's for Christmas dinner and skidog's for an East Coast New Year's Eve, complete with cigars imported from a country that shall not be named. Good times.

The situation is grim, but not hopeless. We're lucky to be able to ski as much of the mountain as we are, and by choosing your lines carefully you can avoid the obvious potential for rock damage. The High T still isn't skiable but at least we're able to enjoy Backside, which has by and large been skiing rather well. So have lines off Baldy Shoulder. A couple of times this week we got an inch or two of new snow, which made a world of difference. Holiday crowds were unusually light, so things didn't get hammered too badly. I pulled into the Wildcat lot on New Year's Day, typically quiet anyway, at nearly 11 a.m. to find it maybe 20% full. I'd hate to see what this week has done to ski resort coffers.

Perhaps the most defeating aspect of everything is that the 10-day forecast continues to look rather bleak. It could be worse, for as frustrating as things are they're better than they are in 90% or more of the country right now.

Here's the period in pictures:

IMG_1565.JPG


IMG_1567.JPG


IMG_1573.JPG


IMG_1575.JPG


IMG_1578.JPG


2011-12-28 08.52.34.jpg


2011-12-29 10.29.01.jpg


IMG_1580.JPG


IMG_1586.JPG


IMG_1587.JPG


IMG_1588.JPG


IMG_1590.JPG
 
I'm amazed Alta did not remotely resemble the claustrophobic $#!&show I suffered through in an almost identical Christmas week in 1986-87. It can't possibly just be increased lift capacity as the slopes look quiet. Where was everybody? Did the people staying in Park City actually ski there all week this time? We know that Christmas week skiers book way ahead. Fewer bookings for non-snow reasons? Did people bail out anyway when they heard how bad it was? We do hear that even reduced Christmas crowds tore up the manmade base at Vail and Mammoth.

My guess is that there was just enough snowmaking at Park City to keep most of those people over there. I strongly suspect there was much less snowmaking in 1986. So people were content to ski the WROD's this time, but in 1986 when they were looking at mostly dirt they came over to LCC and BCC.
 
We had a great day at Snowbird again today! A repeat of yesterday's weather: sunny, beautiful and warm! We investigated Gad2 and Peruvian Gulch with good results. Much fun was had by all!

It has been great catching up with Admin and the gang...New York New Year's at Skidog's was excellent!
 
No sale.

One more week in AK and I will reassess.

I had an identical Fritschi failure at the top of Mt. St Helens. Went out and got Dynafits.
 
Based on my 1986-87 experience I can relate to mrgskier's comments. Alta skiing that week was more than acceptable. The problem wasn't the snow; it was the horrendous liftlines. Since those seem to be absent this time, I guess it's manageable. I'm somewhat surprised that the Snowbird comments are as favorable, as the lower half of the mountain was a minefield in 1986-87. Maybe they have enough snowmaking for there to be routes to the bottom that are safe for one's skis now.

I would not choose to make a discretionary trip to Utah now, but it seems clear to me that it will only take one decent dump to turn the situation around in LCC/BCC. As opposed to the Sierra and I-70 Colorado where it's going to take multiple storms.
 
I would not choose to make a discretionary trip to Utah now, but it seems clear to me that it will only take one decent dump to turn the situation around in LCC/BCC. As opposed to the Sierra and I-70 Colorado where it's going to take multiple storms.
No, it'll take 2...one to avalanche clear to the ground and a second to start from scratch.


-- Sent from my TouchPad using Communities
 
Admin":kikevrbl said:
No, it'll take 2...one to avalanche clear to the ground and a second to start from scratch.

I am afraid you are right. I heard almost the exact words from Titus two weeks ago. If it doesn't happen naturally, patrol will do their best to force it.

When I was out three the week before Christmas, a lot of the underlying snow was like loose sugar.
 
All things consdered looks like there is a lot to play around with out there...I have those same bindings...oy...
 
agreed. It gives me hope we can still mkae it to Utah in a month for a trip instead of going to the PNW. ( not that it would be a terrible thing...)
 
Drew Hardesty wrote in today's avi advisory:

Riding conditions are fair to poor. Skinning and snowshoeing conditions are, well...are not for the faint of heart. They range from mostly supportable to trapdoor on the sun and rain crusts to cat-on-a-linoleum-floor bulletproof boiler-plate to wallowing through unsupportable facets and depth-hoar. Forgot your skin-wax? Then enjoy these up-track conditions with an extra two pounds of snow stuck to the bottom of your skins. (This would never happen to me...) To skin all day like this only to avoid the steep terrain on the down. I honestly wouldn't trade it for the world.

Remember, those are backcountry conditions and not resort in-bounds terrain, but it does give an indication of what we currently face.
 
Powderqueen":m7oot2ub said:
Nice crotch shot.

Too bad for you that the best part is out of view.

Powderqueen":m7oot2ub said:
Cigarette burn is a nice touch. Do you get a draft? or just use it for ventilation?

It's actually a feature Arc'teryx puts in all of its ski pants.

Sent from my Android device using Tapatalk
 
Powderqueen":hi3ag639 said:
Admin":hi3ag639 said:
It's actually a feature Arc'teryx puts in all of its ski pants.

Oh, it's the fly...makes sense. Looks about the right size :wink:

Touche.


Sent from my Android device using Tapatalk
 
Admin, 40 years without a binding failure is an impressive record. Since you mostly ski Alta, it seems unlikely you do much bump skiing these days. Was there a time in the past when you might have spent more time in the bumps than you do now? If not, that might explain the longevity of your bindings. In my experience, bumps are where equipment wears out the quickest. In my youth (before I went free-heel), I completely exploded at least two sets of bindings on eastern moguls.
 
Skied many bumps in the past, and more than my share in this low snow year. Still hate 'em.

Sent from my Android device using Tapatalk
 
flyover":2ndmn608 said:
Since you mostly ski Alta, it seems unlikely you do much bump skiing these days.
Don't ever have the idea that there aren't many bumps at Alta. it's like any other place, when it hasn't snowed for a couple days it gets bumped up like any other place. It can have mean and nasty bumps.
 
SnowbirdDevotee":23e2kqwy said:
flyover":23e2kqwy said:
Since you mostly ski Alta, it seems unlikely you do much bump skiing these days.
Don't ever have the idea that there aren't many bumps at Alta. it's like any other place, when it hasn't snowed for a couple days it gets bumped up like any other place. It can have mean and nasty bumps.
Here's a March 2002 pic taken from the road above GMD of most of High Rustler. I think it qualifies as being bumped.

DSC00308.JPG
 
I generally avoid bumps like the plague, but this season that's harder to do than normal. Typically if a line at Alta is sporting bumps I'll pick a different line. Life is too short to ski bumps.

Sent from my Android device using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top