rfarren
New member
Tony Crocker":1t12h4gv said:It is amazing how the marketing strategies are polar opposites in the top two Rocky Mountain ski markets.
I think it makes sense. SLC is a large metro area literally within 15 minutes of all the resorts. Its resorts are by and large shunned by many destination skiers: lack of towns, the slopes are too hard, mormons, you can't drink etc. That isn't the truth but is the perception. Park City is the exception to the rule, and gets plenty of destination skiers. In the case of LCC it makes sense to have really expensive season passes. If you make it too cheap the slopes will be swamped. That being said it's amazing how often you meet locals on the chairs. IMHO LCC's bread and butter are it's locals, so they pump up revenue via season passes, then poach vacationers away from the Park City resorts with inexpensive day tickets.