If you read the all the threads on the subject, I think we mentioned very often the fact that weather is not helping a lot this year and that it was may be a little bit exagerated to open 2-3 days, to reclose, in early october, in the early 90s, cause they brought big expectations to the skiers. <BR> <BR>But the major point is probably the fact that <B>all</B> the ski areas now don't want to open before to be top to bottom with a "good choice of trails". We don't care of the fu**in choice of trails and the T2B skiing, we just want to ski at all. We just want to have 1 ski area to ski early (not necessary to be on oct 1 neither). More than 1 place is not necessary and we're even ready to drive 3-4 hours to get there (10h for Jonny). If people were not so much desesperated after years without october skiing, there would be a real market for this, very probably. I can tell you that looking all the skiers & boarders skiing on the little patches of snow at St-Sauveur on august 30, there is a real market at least here and I'm sure this kind of event would have the same effect in New England. <BR> <BR>We shouldn't talk of Killington anyway, cause with the removal of the Cascade's double, it's now just too much complicated to offer early season skiing there. Another ski area should take this market that could certainly be quite lucrative, if wisely managed. Many mountains received a big lot of snow in the last days. Tremblant could be open since early october without problem, with the top of the north side and knowing Tremblant, it's 100% sure that it would have been profitable for them. <BR> <BR>May be we should stop to "talk badly" of Killington and ASC, but a true fact remains, there is market that could be developped in the northeast and it is not done, which is extremely frustrating for the dedicated skiers.