DJAK
New member
ChrisC":1dqqkrg3 said:I agree. I've written about this.
My first reaction when getting off the Summit lift on my first time visit - April powder day in 2000 -- 'This is 360 skiable. They do not market the entire backside. Expletive!"
I do not think people understand the place until they have been there.
Ah yes the two opposing user groups at Mt. Bachelor. Some say "WTF why are you marketing 360 degrees of skiing when it's only open half the time"? The other says "you are so epic why don't you hype yourself more?". Finding that balance is the only hope. We have to communicate low hype to our local audience to build our cred back (they see right thru hype), which impacts our out of market message. Hard to have two successful messages that do not agree with one another. Other mtns can go the high hype routes as they do not have the 100,000 people in their backyard who will call BS and impact the overall reputation. I even saw a large resort in oregon (nameless) start hyping opening early on Oct 4 when it snowed 6" (then melted), mostly to sell passes. If we did that we'd get crucified by improperly set expectations.
But to Marc's question:
About 55 people in attendance
Hottest topics:
New lift location and access to its base via lift or human power (human power would be a slog, but potentially helpful)
Mtn Biking generally well received (but few comments)
Night skiing brought up by public, but lots of varying viewpoints (not in current proposal)
Location of tubing and Nordic implications
Future of Rainbow (lots of ideas tossed out)
Future of Red (lots of ideas tossed out)
Future of halfpipe
Sunrise base adjustments generally well recieved
Uphill capacity at base areas when some parts of mtn closed (cycling skiing vs traveling to other lifts skiing)
Good other thread going too.
AK