With no new snow reported today, I think we can conclude that Portillo's storm total is 98 inches. That's season-to-date on Portillo's website today minus the 72 inches I reported Aug. 13.
SnowBrains, as we should know, will publish anything that looks exciting without curating its accuracy. I'm fairly sure that Snow-Forecast does not research and publish actual snowfalls after they happen. They publish what their models called for on those days. Past experience has told me that Snow-Forecast frequently overpredicts for the Andes.
OpenSnow's last post was Wednesday. It reported storm totals of 107 inches at Portillo, 56 at Valle Nevado and 59-138 at Las Lenas. That's Luke Stone's narrative report, and I know OpenSnow forecasters make a strong effort to curate what they report. As for Las Lenas, I know for a fact from when I was there that snow is formally measured only at the base. The 138 inches is possible and perhaps even likely, but if you've ever been to Las Lenas you know that number is a SWAG. Given wind and avalanche exposure, it's not possible to measure snowfall high on that mountain.
SnowBrains, as we should know, will publish anything that looks exciting without curating its accuracy. I'm fairly sure that Snow-Forecast does not research and publish actual snowfalls after they happen. They publish what their models called for on those days. Past experience has told me that Snow-Forecast frequently overpredicts for the Andes.
OpenSnow's last post was Wednesday. It reported storm totals of 107 inches at Portillo, 56 at Valle Nevado and 59-138 at Las Lenas. That's Luke Stone's narrative report, and I know OpenSnow forecasters make a strong effort to curate what they report. As for Las Lenas, I know for a fact from when I was there that snow is formally measured only at the base. The 138 inches is possible and perhaps even likely, but if you've ever been to Las Lenas you know that number is a SWAG. Given wind and avalanche exposure, it's not possible to measure snowfall high on that mountain.
Last edited: