The future of glade skiing in NYS

Sharon

New member
I had a little chat with the sales director of Greek Peak last Friday regarding all the wooded terrain that could be turned into glades at Greek Peak if only they would remove the tree tops when they are logging. The tree tops have created some serious blockages on what would otherwise be phenominal tree skiing. I have been urging management to develop the glades and that more glades would increase the status of Greek Peak and would bring in more people.

The response I got was that glade skiing may become illegal in NY and that insurance companies will not insure a ski area if it allows glade skiing.

While I realize that this is coming from the mouth of a sales director, the puppet management, it does make me wonder if insurance may force ski areas to close gladed areas. I do know that they are cracking down on glade skiing at Gore and there are a set of rules that apply to each trail in order to be covered by insurance.
 
Sounds to me like history likes to repeat itself.

I can recall the Ins industry going nuts over jumps (all shut down for a decade, then reborn bigger than ever of course).

Then they went nuts over safety bars on lifts being closed - to the point of ski areas posting obnoxious 'safety rangers' to yell at anyone not putting bars down (even law in some states now to close the bar, though virtually no one cares to bother you to put it down if you don't want anymore). I've seen studies done on this particular issue - no statisical benefit of any kind to injuries or deaths by having safety bars on lifts.

To purely guess, that maybe the Ins industry believes that too many have either been getting lost OB from glades or killed/injured by hitting trees - so close those tree skiing areas down! Most likely the point of view of a bunch of non-skiing execs somewhere who have no idea about the sport. But just wild speculation on my part. These insurance and lawsuit things seem to crop up way more in the East...
 
i bet more people die from hitting trees that are on the sides of open trails, more than people hit trees in the glades. On an open trail, people are likely going faster, and if they mess up, they may go off the trail at high speed where those nasty and deadly trees may be looming.

I think they should outlaw tree-less trails...they are much more dangerous :lol:

trees make people ski slower
 
Sharon":1kwqwevz said:
I had a little chat with the sales director of Greek Peak last Friday regarding all the wooded terrain that could be turned into glades at Greek Peak if only they would remove the tree tops when they are logging. The tree tops have created some serious blockages on what would otherwise be phenominal tree skiing. I have been urging management to develop the glades and that more glades would increase the status of Greek Peak and would bring in more people.

The response I got was that glade skiing may become illegal in NY and that insurance companies will not insure a ski area if it allows glade skiing.

While I realize that this is coming from the mouth of a sales director, the puppet management, it does make me wonder if insurance may force ski areas to close gladed areas. I do know that they are cracking down on glade skiing at Gore and there are a set of rules that apply to each trail in order to be covered by insurance.

That's why I don't ski Greek anymore. The last 2 times I was there they wanted to arrest us for skiing the trees.
 
Sharon":2ykohvsj said:
i bet more people die from hitting trees that are on the sides of open trails, more than people hit trees in the glades.
Bingo. If insurance companies are forcing ski area's hands regarding not allowing tree skiing, they should look at the death rates. I can not recall the last New England skiing death that involved glade skiing but I can recall almost double digits this year from groomed trails. Surely death rates are higher on high speed groomers, not sure what the general level of injuries are. Gotta suspect injuries in general are higher on open slopes.... not speaking from personal experience of course. :roll: Then again, that was not on an actual marked glade.
 
Sharon and River have it right. Remember Michael Kennedy and Sonny Bono? Same thing. High speed on a groomed trail, lose control and hit a fixed object is by far the leading cause of inbounds deaths at ski areas. Hard snow on the groomed trails probably raises the danger of this. Not only in the East, but supposedly Sun Valley sees a disproportionate share of these accidents.

The underrated danger of glade skiing is suffocation in tree wells. Many of the cat/heli operators discuss this in their safety briefings. Do the eastern gladed areas have some of these deaths?
 
Tony Crocker said:
Sharon and River have it right. Remember Michael Kennedy and Sonny Bono? Same thing. High speed on a groomed trail, lose control and hit a fixed object is by far the leading cause of inbounds deaths at ski areas. Hard snow on the groomed trails probably raises the danger of this. Not only in the East, but supposedly Sun Valley sees a disproportionate share of these accidents.

The underrated danger of glade skiing is suffocation in tree wells. Many of the cat/heli operators discuss this in their safety briefings. Do the eastern gladed areas have some of these deaths?

yeah, like we get enough snow to actually have tree wells for any sustained period of time... :wink:
 
joegm":3mwztgoa said:
yeah, like we get enough snow to actually have tree wells for any sustained period of time... :wink:

Base depths have hovered +/- 100 inches for much of the season at the Mansfield stake, so yeah, there's enough snow.

The difference is the forest, as most tree skiing in the east is done amongst deciduous trees, not conifers, so there's no apron to restrict snowfall around the base of the tree. I know of folks who have been tripped up by a conifer well in the East, but never heard of an eastern fatality caused by one.
 
This is from last year.....he wasn't getting out on his own

2383614659_cf231002e2.jpg


2383603291_684ee2978b.jpg

it got worse as he struggled
1479698535_db0b0e17cb.jpg
 
jamesdeluxe":1pe99qu3 said:
"Nah, I'm not going to help you out. But I am going to take photos!"
:lol:

I did make sure he was not injured first. Then the photos and then got him out as his struggling started getting him turned more upside down
 
Sharon":m2yapn2k said:
there are a set of rules that apply to each trail in order to be covered by insurance.

Well, have we not seen this before somewhat at Greek Peak in the 1980s?

Around 1980, I remember the Greek Peak East area opened a glade - now on the map as Alsos (I thought it orginally was Aesop's). But a few years later - it was gone. Signs ripped down. Not encouraged. I thought it was insurance related. I do not know when it came back, but it's back. But at a different legal/insurance climate.

Also, Ronnie's Run. I'm not sure when things changed - but now Ronnie is gone. (Wasn't Ronnie a beloved ski patroller killed in an avalanche somewhere else? Anyways, dead and forgotten.) And now it is known as Aesop's? Is the whole area cleared between Castor and Atlas?

I hope these areas are not taken out of comission.
 
Tony Crocker":zl2fx7om said:
Sharon and River have it right. Remember Michael Kennedy and Sonny Bono? Same thing. High speed on a groomed trail, lose control and hit a fixed object is by far the leading cause of inbounds deaths at ski areas.

I thought Sonny died in a tree well on the Nevada side of Heavenly. They had to cut it down because it -the tree- got too popular.

I've always thought tree wells were the worst in the Pac NW or Sierra. I'm far less scared of those in the Rockies or New England.
 
Tony Crocker":3c24porc said:
The underrated danger of glade skiing is suffocation in tree wells. Many of the cat/heli operators discuss this in their safety briefings. Do the eastern gladed areas have some of these deaths?
My experience is tree wells are more annoying than dangerous around here. There are not a lot of locations in New England where you are skiing over and around half or fully buried conifers. One or tree wells have tried to eat me but it usually only involves sinking down to your knee and having a frustrating few moments digging your tip and tail out. Admin has it right that most glade skiing is done away from the conifers in hard wood glades. The other aspect is New England's infamous rain/freeze cycles. You don't sink down to far when the bottom seven feet of snow pack is rock hard solid and you couldn't dig your way down without a shovel.
 
Admin":36efikl4 said:
joegm":36efikl4 said:
yeah, like we get enough snow to actually have tree wells for any sustained period of time... :wink:
Base depths have hovered +/- 100 inches for much of the season at the Mansfield stake, so yeah, there's enough snow. The difference is the forest, as most tree skiing in the east is done amongst deciduous trees, not conifers, so there's no apron to restrict snowfall around the base of the tree.
As Marc and others have noted, there’s plenty of snow in some areas around here to make it happen. Even in an average year there’s going to be over six feet of snowpack on Mansfield’s upper elevations (where the conifer skiing is generally found at Stowe), which is enough to swallow up somebody. Freeze/thaw cycles may help to minimize the issue somewhat, but remember we’re not talking about snow here, but a lack of it. A freeze/thaw might stabilize some of the longer branches of the tree in the surrounding snowpack, but in terms of the dangerous air pocket, it doesn’t matter if that goes through freeze/thaw cycles because there’s nothing there but air. As soon as more snow falls, any hints that there was a tree well in the area are going to be covered up, and you now have more potential snow to fall down on top of you when you’re in the hole. Most of the time it’s just nuisance stuff like River said, but sometimes it is more substantial. I can personally recall at least two instances of more dangerous tree well encounters here in Vermont. One was the case of my friend Scott back in the 90s. We were skiing in the open conifers up above Stowe’s Nosedive Glades, when he fell into a tree well and couldn’t get out on his own. I didn’t witness that one first hand because I was too far from him. The other was on March 6th, 2001 at Sugarbush in the Sunrise Snowfield, where my friend James went down into a tree well. That tree well was actually more substantial than Scott’s, but James was a bit luckier and would have been able to extract himself from it without assistance. I talk about those episodes a bit in an entry I made to a SkiVT-L thread.

I caught the Sugarbush encounter on video, so you can see an example of what going down in a tree well is actually like at the end of the movie below. Right click to download:

Sunrise Snowfield Video

There’s also a thread on SkiVT-L from February 2004, where tree wells are discussed, and you can read about some encounters that others have had (not necessarily Eastern U.S.). Just use the “Next in Topic” link to follow the thread.

I never had or heard of any tree well encounters in my five years of skiing at Lost Trail Powder Mountain in Montana. I did do an extensive amount of tree skiing there, and they generally do get enough snow for it to be an issue. It could be just luck that nobody I knew ever encountered one, but it may also have something to do with the structure of the trees there. Lost Trail tends to have a lot of pines as far as I can tell, with some that don’t even have branches in the bottom 10 to 20 feet of the trunk, and in those that do have branches in the heights where people are skiing, such as the smaller trees, the pine vegetation is very sparse compared to spruces, firs, and other more dense evergreens. So, there may not be much of an air pocket created by these trees. Actually, another name I’ve heard used for tree wells is “spruce traps” so there has certainly been some association established spruces and tree wells at some point.

J.Spin
 
Why is tree skiing an issue only for ski areas in NYS? Aren't the same inurance companies insuring areas in VT, NH and other states? Why would it only be an insurance issue in NY? I suspect it has more to do with the liability laws of the state affecting how the insurance company views its financial stake in an injury/fatality. What kind of "hold harmless" laws are in place in NY? Could it be that a "Ski at your own risk" sign in NYS is meaningless but in NH or VT it relieves the ski area and their underwiter of some liability?
 
Have to believe this more of Greeks backasswards policy. I asked a someone who owns a ski area in NY and he knew nothing of this
 
it is very likely that the Greek Peak official who told me this is talking out his ass. Wouldn't surprise me.

As for the glades at GP...we have Aesops and Alsops and both are nice, but there is a huge potential for more. But it seems that management is leery of going in that direction, even though it could elevate the status of GP from a molehill, to a glade paradise in CNY.
 
Back
Top