Snowbasin 12/24/12

Marc_C":2xbk0yl5 said:
Just so there are no misinterpretations (as some tend to on this forum), I think Snowbasin is a killer ski area, with a great mix of terrain, trees, and enough groomers to keep everyone happy. I wish it was higher, had more parts that faced the northern quadrant of the compass (but we still want those south aspects for cold spring mornings), and was 30 minutes closer.

+1

Evren":2xbk0yl5 said:
It is still befuddling why someone won't take my $1500-1800 and give the freedom to ski any resort in the area.

1. Economics 101: supply, demand and charging what the market will bear. It's a business, not a charity. It's designed to maximize revenue for owners, be they individuals or shareholders, and certainly not designed just to please some guy named Evren. There are plenty who are willing to plunk down $1750 or whatever it is just for LCC. Four just on these fora that I know of, actually, do just that, and almost certainly more that I don't know of. And you wanna know something? They get what they paid for, year in and year out.
2. Name me one ski state or Canadian province that offers what you want. Really, just try. No two resorts in Utah share common ownership, yet everyone in this state's ski marketing group gets along and cooperates for the common good more than I've ever encountered in any other state.

Evren":2xbk0yl5 said:
I would say 50% of average is yes, abnormal.

Where precisely are you coming up with that figure? Reputable references required, please.

Not to say anyone beats Alta when it comes to quantity of snow but I paid less than half as much for a pass at Snowbasin. That has to figure in somehow.

Perhaps it does, in the sense that you got what you paid for?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
 
Admin":2dwdg4at said:
Where precisely are you coming up with that figure? Reputable references required, please.

WasatchWeatherWeenies post from Dec 20 which you also quoted recently: showing Snowbird at 134%, Ben Lomond Peak Snotel (8K feet) at 57% and Ben Lomond Trail Snotel (6K feet) at 26% of to-date average. Snowbasin being at the 6500 to 9K level and near Ben Lomond, should correspond roughly with the 26% to 57% readings. I didn't think you would dispute that Northern Wasatch has had abnormally low snowfall to-date.

I understand that they are not in business to give me a good deal. However. They already have things set-up to make an offer like this (SkiUtah gold/silver). The issue is price. An Alta pass is $999 pre-season. Excluding DV, no single area is above $1000. Some, substantially lower. It costs the resorts nothing extra except some accounting to offer flexibility. Most pass holders go to a single area, the way things are. So it's not like they would cannibalize business from people who get multiple passes. But they would get additional revenue, almost double, from people who currently use just one area and would opt for the multi-area pass. Ski days would go up, and so would on-mountain revenue.

Yes, no one is offering this currently. But only a few years ago there was no EPIC pass, and season passes at PCMR, Snowbasin, and Canyons cost substantially more. There does seem to be a workable model around lower prices & higher volume of season passes sold. Utah is somewhat of a unique market where a multi-area pass would make sense logistically, and many of the resorts could easily handle more volume. I don't see how the resorts lose under such a setup.
 
admin":zqy0l96w said:
Snowbasin doesn't get 400" average despite any marketing claims that it does. Your impatience this season, however, belies the real truth: because of low elevation and aspect Snowbasin has a shorter core season than that found in LCC. It almost always takes a while to get going, just like this year, and it ends sooner as well.

This is hardly abnormal.
Correct on all counts. Snowbasin averages 309 inches mid-mountain and while we're in the neighborhood Powder Mt. averages no more than 375. Mid-mountain is less than 8,000 feet vs. 9,500 in LCC, and yes AltaBird also is higher proportion north facing. The same comparisons apply to the Park City group except at those areas the snowfall tails off to only 150 inches at base elevation. When you have all the factors affecting snow reliability working in favor of the same areas it is no surprise that LCC/BCC have very long reliable seasons while the other places are reliable only during the core of the season.

As noted in many other threads, destination visitors from afar who come to Utah mid-season may prefer Park City for its resort ambience or perhaps even Snowbasin for its elegant facilities and less competitive atmosphere than AltaBird. But for those who live in Utah and ski enough to consider a season pass, it's quite difficult for me to understand why one would pass up the areas with twice the length of reliable season and at least twice the frequency of powder days.
 
Evren":36c0svkt said:
Snowbird at 134%, Ben Lomond Peak Snotel (8K feet) at 57% and Ben Lomond Trail Snotel (6K feet) at 26% of to-date average. Snowbasin being at the 6500 to 9K level and near Ben Lomond, should correspond roughly with the 26% to 57% readings.

Not at all. Neither of those sites are within 10 miles of Snowbasin and not on a mountain even aligned the same way, and are therefore completely irrelevant. That's like saying that Ensign Peak above Salt Lake City has snowfall analogous to LCC.

You'll have to do better than that.

In addition, looking only at averages is over-simplifying the issue. You also need to look at variability, which I suspect is huge early season at Snowbasin from year to year.

Evren":36c0svkt said:
Yes, no one is offering this currently.

There is one, and you said it yourself. If you want that flexibility pony up $2500 for a Ski Utah Silver Pass. And while on paper the number sold is limited, in reality Ski Utah struggles every year to sell out its quota. If you don't want to spend that kind of dough you have to settle for the relative value proposition that you paid for. You've instead chosen a value product, yet you expect to receive the benefit of a premium product. You don't see the failed logic in that?

Evren":36c0svkt said:
But only a few years ago there was no EPIC pass, and season passes at PCMR, Snowbasin, and Canyons cost substantially more. There does seem to be a workable model around lower prices & higher volume of season passes sold.

For those who need to provide more incentive for purchasers, they can do that by lowering prices, however for those that don't have to...

Evren":36c0svkt said:
Utah is somewhat of a unique market where a multi-area pass would make sense logistically, and many of the resorts could easily handle more volume. I don't see how the resorts lose under such a setup.

You need to remember that in our market you can't make it up in volume. This isn't Colorado where there's a local population base of nearly 3 million. We have a population that's barely a third of that and with more local resorts from which to choose. It's a finite market where nearly all serious Wasatch Front skiers already buy a pass, so all you're doing is cannibalizing. Also, unlike Colorado (read: Vail Resorts) a full half of our annual skier visits come from locals so a substantial portion of annual revenue comes from season pass sales.

Utah resorts further don't have Vail Resorts' vertical integration where locking a visitor into their properties all winter via a low-ball season pass price generates additional revenue for the company through lodging, evening nightclubs and village dining, retail, rental and even the airport shuttle to the resort. Billy Bob from Dallas who takes two ski trips a year (or Sven from Minneapolis who normally skis during the week at Afton Alps anyway) will always vacation at a Vail Resort because he paid $569 for an Epic Pass and has a marginal ski day cost of $0, yet Vail Resorts will make an extra $2500 or more from him because they own everything in town. If Billy Bob is loaded he might even spring for a multi-million dollar residence at the Vail Resorts-owned Ritz-Carlton.

Utah resorts don't have that ability. Only Snowbird and Sundance have a corner on the lodging and dining market at their resorts and the bed bases there are tiny and therefore relatively insignificant. Solitude's village averages around 60% occupancy and the couple of village eateries are independent. Brighton owns no beds. The Park City resorts live off the countless independent hoteliers and restaurateurs in town. Hell, Alta doesn't own a single pillow or even a single one of their on-mountain restaurants - all are independently operated. In the European model, they own the lifts and little else.

Snowbasin admittedly doesn't have a bed base, either, but a) Holding doesn't really give a rat's ass whether his mountain makes money or not, and b) this year's pass price reduction there was all about trying to take local business away from other Wasatch resorts. Trying to fit Snowbasin into our local business model is like trying to force a square peg into a round hole, and it will remain that way until Holding passes on to the other side and his kids sell the place off to someone who actually cares about profits.

A season pass price war or a multi-resort pass product here might have a couple of winners - namely those resorts that have a tough time selling passes as it is - but would assuredly have many losers.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
 
I have LCC/BCC and Park City at 97-104% of normal snowfall as of Dec. 23. Snowbasin is at 68% since November 1 if you exclude 36 of the 93 inches reported on their website being from that October storm. I am assuming that due to the consistent reports that Snowbasin/Powder Mt. are lagging in coverage and open terrain even relative to the Park City group. It is normal for Snowbasin to lag the Cottonwoods in opening terrain in early season. It is not normal for Snowbasin to lag Park City.
admin":x5hxoey0 said:
In addition, looking only at averages is over-simplifying the issue. You also need to look at variability, which I suspect is huge early season at Snowbasin from year to year.
Partially true. Mid-mountain Snowbasin has exactly the same average snowfall as Park City Summit House, but Snowbasin's standard deviation is 23% higher. Bu the bottom line for both Park City and Snowbasin is that when you only average 60% of LCC snowfall the latter areas are going to get covered a lot faster and the former areas are going to hurt more in below average snow years. Averages and standard deviations for Utah ski areas here: http://173.193.223.192/~bestsnow/utahnet.htm

admin":x5hxoey0 said:
yet Vail Resorts will make an extra $2500 from him because they own everything in town.
Especially true vs. the Cottonwoods because even most of the destination visitors are staying down the hill cheap in SLC.

Compensating for the high season pass prices is the fact that day ticket prices (especially from the Utah ski shops) are far lower than in Colorado or California. Or Vermont for that matter.
 
We had this discussion four years ago -- making Snowbasin your home mountain is taking a risk during early and late season; however, I don't see how you can fault Evren for buying the bargain-basement pass. That's an incredible deal.

Even in a worst-case scenario (a no-show during December and sloppy in early April, which Admin correctly notes is not unheard-of), in playing the "if I were a SLC local" game, I'd go for a Snowbasin pass with blackout days supplemented with a Cottonwoods midweek pass. The three months of mid-winter use would make it worthwhile, especially given the new discounted price.
 
20 inches, britches!!! LCC has 14'' and is on avalanche control delay, of course :-)
First person to send me a picture of cars waiting to get into LCC, gets a drink at Cinnabar Lounge in Snowbasin. After Jan 1st ](*,)
Bonus points for Alta stickers visible on cars. It will be paid from the "slush fund" of money I saved getting a pass at Basin.
I will be at PCMR today, which got 8''. Having lost 35 lbs since last season, I can probably float on that...
 
jamesdeluxe":3s3iczl2 said:
making Snowbasin your home mountain is taking a risk during early and late season; however, I don't see how you can fault Evren for buying the bargain-basement pass. That's an incredible deal.

No one here is, least of all me. When the price was announced I told everyone and anyone who I thought might take advantage of it. I'm just tired of hearing him whine about the decision he made, especially when this is a rather normal early season MO for the place, which he apparently didn't bother to research. I'm also tired of the mistaken perceptions about LCC that he has demonstrated such as:

Evren":3s3iczl2 said:
20 inches, britches!!! LCC has 14'' and is on avalanche control delay, of course :-)
First person to send me a picture of cars waiting to get into LCC, gets a drink at Cinnabar Lounge in Snowbasin.

Estimated road opening 8:30, which is 45 minutes before they load the first chair.

(Update: 8:30 a.m. precisely and the road just opened, be-otch. Cars are moving nicely even during the holiday week. They'll be in the Wildcat lot by 8:40-8:45 with a half hour to boot up.)

aux14604.png


The picture you should be looking for, however, is of the "Closed" sign on John Paul while they delay its opening for - wait for it, wait for it - avalanche control.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
 
Admin":20p4kbo9 said:
Evren":20p4kbo9 said:
20 inches, britches!!! LCC has 14'' and is on avalanche control delay, of course :-)
First person to send me a picture of cars waiting to get into LCC, gets a drink at Cinnabar Lounge in Snowbasin.

Estimated road opening 8:30, which is 45 minutes before they load the first chair.

The picture he should be looking for is of the "Closed" sign on John Paul while they do (wait for it, wait for it)... avalanche control.

Even when LCC is closed till 8:30 for avi control, I can still get to Alta sooner than Snowbasin.
Since Evren apparently has some reading comprehension issues, we'll say it again: concerns about LCC being closed for avi control / risk are totally overblown and irrelevant 99% of the time. In 11 seasons of skiing Alta/Bird about 55-65 days per season, I've been prevented from skiing there on a day I wanted to/was able to due to closure or no parking precisely 4 times. I've been delayed (meaning arriving after 11a) due to road closure an additional 3 times. So a week spread out over nearly 600 days. That's irrelevant.
 
Something we haven't discussed other than the road is that on big snow days, the resorts often have a difficult time opening terrain. Snowbird fares a little worse in this respect than Alta, in that while Alta can run all their lifts and just keep certain gates closed, the Bird often needs to keep entire lifts off-line for a while, like today:


Lift Status

Aerial Tram (9 am - 3:45 pm) Open
Baby Thunder (9 am - 3:45 pm) Pending
Baldy (9 am - 3:30 pm) Pending
Chickadee (9 am - 5 pm) Open
Gad 2 (9 am - 4 pm) Pending
Gadzoom (9 am - 4 pm) Open
Little Cloud (9 am - 3:45 pm) Pending
Mid-Gad (9 am - 4:15 pm) Open
Mineral Basin (9 am - 3:30 pm) Pending
Peruvian (9 am - 4 pm) Pending
Wilbere (9 am - 4:30 pm) Open
 
Admin":2jk3jqrv said:
The picture you should be looking for, however, is of the "Closed" sign on John Paul while they delay its opening for - wait for it, wait for it - avalanche control.

We're also anxiously awaiting the whining that will accompany the scratches and dings (oh, I guess I mean core shots) the skis will endure. From Snowbasin:
Snowbasin Resort will open the John Paul Express Lift tomorrow, December 27th. Please be aware that the terrain accessed by John Paul Express is limited to advanced and expert Skiers/Snowboarders only. Early season conditions exist. Many unmarked hazards exist at or just below the snow surface. Please obey all posted signs. Due to these early season conditions there will be no groomed runs available from the John Paul Express.
 
I agree the Snowbasin season pass was a great deal. Considering buying the more expensive Canyons pass in addition was what struck me as bizarre. A Mountain Collective for Alta might have been worth considering before it expired Dec. 17, particularly since Jackson is also within weekend drive distance.

MarcC":3gfbn3v9 said:
Snowbird fares a little worse in this respect than Alta, in that while Alta can run all their lifts and just keep certain gates closed, the Bird often needs to keep entire lifts off-line for a while
In terms of terrain openings I seem to run into these days when Alta is the area that is slower to get things open. When Backside remains offline all day it's tedious getting around and you better have the timing right when other stuff opens. There was also the matter of the power issue last March, and I read that was not the first time for that problem.

All of the above does not change the many, perhaps even a slight majority of circumstances where Alta might be preferred over Snowbird on a powder day. But it's far from cut and dried, and the flexibility to move between areas depending upon the not always predictable sequence of lift/terrain openings is a strong argument for the AltaBird combined pass IMHO, particularly for the Utah locals.
 
ha....you want to blab about the 20" snowbasin got over the 14" (ALWAYS UNDER REPORTED from my personal experience) at Alta thats great....but i seem to recall you're on blackout anyway so you wont be enjoying any of it unless you pony up day ticket prices. So no matter how much they got you can't enjoy it. Not to mention its going to take a bit more to cover the stuff that needs to be covered over in the JP area and this roughly 5% snow aint going to cut it.

Enjoy the weekend bro..the "alta crew" will be slaying pow lines all day...oh wait..Alta's tracked out by 11am..i forgot... :-s

M
 
Skidog":z0ztixy2 said:
Enjoy the weekend bro..the "alta crew" will be slaying pow lines all day...oh wait..Alta's tracked out by 11am..i forgot... :-s
You also forgot that we'll be in a line of cars until 10:30 when the road opens and then we won't be able to park anywhere. Even if we could, we'd encounter hour long lift lines.
 
Tony Crocker":hgbwvnyf said:
MarcC":hgbwvnyf said:
Snowbird fares a little worse in this respect than Alta, in that while Alta can run all their lifts and just keep certain gates closed, the Bird often needs to keep entire lifts off-line for a while
In terms of terrain openings I seem to run into these days when Alta is the area that is slower to get things open.
I was only referring to Snowbird's propensity to keep entire lifts off-line until control work is complete - not specific terrain openings. Topologically, that makes a certain amount of sense, since so much of the Bird's avi terrain has runout zones squarely in the terrain that would be accessible by the same lift.

Tony Crocker":hgbwvnyf said:
When Backside remains offline all day it's tedious getting around...
Huh? That makes no sense and it's not factual. You realize that Backside ends at Gunsight and usually even when Backside is closed, everything from Gunsight northward is fully open (Gunsight, Rope-a-Dope, Thirds, Cheaters, Greeley Bowl, Greeley Hill, Crescent, Western Air, Elevator Shaft, North Russ, the Nest, Highboy.....), yes?


Tony Crocker":hgbwvnyf said:
... and you better have the timing right when other stuff opens.
Again, Backside has no impact on that - it's true whether or not Backside is open.


Tony Crocker":hgbwvnyf said:
There was also the matter of the power issue last March, and I read that was not the first time for that problem.
Read where? That's another case of a supposed recurring problem that I've only experienced the one time in 11 seasons. A transformer was taken out by lightning.

Tony Crocker":hgbwvnyf said:
All of the above does not change the many, perhaps even a slight majority of circumstances where Alta might be preferred over Snowbird on a powder day. But it's far from cut and dried, and the flexibility to move between areas depending upon the not always predictable sequence of lift/terrain openings is a strong argument for the AltaBird combined pass IMHO, particularly for the Utah locals.
I agree, and it was fine when the combined pass was $1250, and $1300, and even $1400. Now that the early season price is $1700, I can no longer justify that up-charge.
 
Marc_C":30ftvt7a said:
Skidog":30ftvt7a said:
Enjoy the weekend bro..the "alta crew" will be slaying pow lines all day...oh wait..Alta's tracked out by 11am..i forgot... :-s
You also forgot that we'll be in a line of cars until 10:30 when the road opens and then we won't be able to park anywhere. Even if we could, we'd encounter hour long lift lines.

Sooo funny...even with a full maze on a deep day the collins line is never longer than about 25 min..ive NEVER in my 6 years here encountered a lift line even close to 60 minutes.

as for the road??? Well get the heck in line earlier. When i know its going to be deep and road closed i either try to beat the closure (rarely happens) or cue up in line REALLY early. rest in the car if you need to.

Also little trick on the parking. Dont pay any attention to the parking attendants. Drive right to the first row or 2...most days I can park within about 5 or 6 cars from the front of the line as people leave GMD and leave empty close spots..also the Alta pickup pulls out of its nearly front row spot after theyve filled about 5 rows half way...always a killer spot. At worst I have to park down the end of the first row (usually half way by the time i get there), this way its easy for me to remember where i parked..just walk straight til i see the car... ;)

YMMV......

M
 
Skidog":3ao7cusp said:
Marc_C":3ao7cusp said:
Skidog":3ao7cusp said:
Enjoy the weekend bro..the "alta crew" will be slaying pow lines all day...oh wait..Alta's tracked out by 11am..i forgot... :-s
You also forgot that we'll be in a line of cars until 10:30 when the road opens and then we won't be able to park anywhere. Even if we could, we'd encounter hour long lift lines.

Sooo funny...even with a full maze on a deep day the collins line is never longer than about 25 min..ive NEVER in my 6 years here encountered a lift line even close to 60 minutes.

as for the road??? Well get the heck in line earlier. When i know its going to be deep and road closed i either try to beat the closure (rarely happens) or cue up in line REALLY early. rest in the car if you need to.

Also little trick on the parking. Dont pay any attention to the parking attendants. Drive right to the first row or 2...most days I can park within about 5 or 6 cars from the front of the line as people leave GMD and leave empty close spots..also the Alta pickup pulls out of its nearly front row spot after theyve filled about 5 rows half way...always a killer spot. At worst I have to park down the end of the first row (usually half way by the time i get there), this way its easy for me to remember where i parked..just walk straight til i see the car... ;)

YMMV......

But, but, but........ Evren says...........
 
Marc_C":3r2cvviv said:
But, but, but........ Evren says...........


oh you're right im sorry....disregard my last post.. Please PM Evren for any and all information RE: LCC conditions.

M
 
jamesdeluxe":1wu8szdo said:
Evren: better to be tarred and feathered online than to raise the white flag on a second Bus Run and be referred to as:
Skidog":1wu8szdo said:

Took me a second but....now im dying laughing...

You're a good sport James...

M
 
Back
Top