q":3ppghnt0 said:Has there been much snow in Utah this year in mid January? :stir:
Recall also that when I wrote that advice, I peppered it with about 8 disclaimers and never once suggested that it was a statistically reliable likelihood. *That* is the strawman that Tony created and has been arguing against all these years. Yes, snowfall amounts from 30 years ago are indeed irrelevant.Admin":943jucgq said:Finally, with regard to Marc_C's advice to visitors seeking powder to avoid mid-January if possible, those flat lines clearly demonstrate why he gives that advice, and I can assure you that none of those visitors skiing in the current decade gives a flying $hit what happened 20 or 30 years ago. This year was an aberration as was 2010-11, but if I wanted to travel to Utah looking for powder, would I deiberately avoid a two-week period that has repeatedly had nearly 0% chance of powder skiing based on the past 5 years? Hells yeah I would. Case closed.
Not the past 5 years, but the Januaries of 2011-2015.admin":1n8lqy0p said:two-week period that has repeatedly had nearly 0% chance of powder skiing based on the past 5 years?
Perhaps in some marginal locations where the rain/snowline has risen over that time period, but for LCC I strongly suspect long term stats are indeed what's relevant.MarcC":1n8lqy0p said:Yes, snowfall amounts from 30 years ago are indeed irrelevant.
Tony Crocker":1c224xit said:Not the past 5 years, but the Januaries of 2011-2015.admin":1c224xit said:two-week period that has repeatedly had nearly 0% chance of powder skiing based on the past 5 years?
Tony Crocker":1c224xit said:January during those 5 years averaged 62% of normal snowfall at Alta Collins. Sounds pretty bad, but the 8 Januaries from 1993-1999 averaged 150%.
This brings us full circle back to your misunderstanding of the issue. Until you understand why averages don't work, because of how they smooth the data and eliminate the precise patterns of storm cycles in what we're talking about, any further discussion is pointless. Like we have said seemingly 100's of times, we're not the ones making the suggestion - we are saying what long term residents, in particular the local meteorologists, have been telling us ever since we moved here. Our direct experience happens to match what they're saying.Tony Crocker":3uij0y7g said:January during those 5 years averaged 62% of normal snowfall at Alta Collins. Sounds pretty bad, but the 8 Januaries from 1993-1999 averaged 150%. It's called weather volatility and in both cases my bet over the long run is reversion to the mean.
Five. But the past 5 years include 2016 and 2017 with abundant January snowfall. Admin chooses to ignore that obvious definition since it erodes his assertion.admin":2ddox5kz said:Really? How many Januaries are there from 2011 to 2015?
Really? The past 5 years of North American snowfall at 85%, 90%, 92%, 68% and 93% included lots of western record lows in 2015 and eastern record lows in 2016. This must prove that the global warming alarmists are right and the North American ski industry is going to hell in a handbasket. Oh wait, 2017 is running at 120+% so far. Sort of like mid-January snowfall the past two seasons.admin":2ddox5kz said:Recent history is all that matters.
Wow. You really don't have any comprehension of statistics other than means and averages.Tony Crocker":2auyx2x6 said:Really? The past 5 years of North American snowfall at 85%, 90%, 92%, 68% and 93% included lots of western record lows in 2015 and eastern record lows in 2016. This must prove that the global warming alarmists are right and the North American ski industry is going to hell in a handbasket. Oh wait, 2017 is running at 120+% so far. Sort of like mid-January snowfall the past two seasons.admin":2auyx2x6 said:Recent history is all that matters.
Either 5 years is credible to prove a permanent weather trend or it isn't.
Tony Crocker":1fiedk7m said:Five. But the past 5 years include 2016 and 2017 with abundant January snowfall. Admin chooses to ignore that obvious definition since it erodes his assertion.admin":1fiedk7m said:Really? How many Januaries are there from 2011 to 2015?
Marc_C":1fiedk7m said:Wow. You really don't have any comprehension of statistics other than means and averages.
Marc_C":257ozqy7 said:This brings us full circle back to your misunderstanding of the issue. Until you understand why averages don't work, because of how they smooth the data and eliminate the precise patterns of storm cycles in what we're talking about, any further discussion is pointless. Like we have said seemingly 100's of times, we're not the ones making the suggestion - we are saying what long term residents, in particular the local meteorologists, have been telling us ever since we moved here. Our direct experience happens to match what they're saying.
If you have an issue with this, take it up with Kevin Eubanks.
The Utah Avalanche Center":37b5qtj0 said:CURRENT CONDITIONS
Maritime. The coastal ranges called, they want their weather back.
Marc_C":3nt3oeqh said:Pretty cool dashboard, although it suffers a bit in design and layout for an efficient dashboard, but gets the job done:
http://wbsweather.com/w/index.php
Tony Crocker":30jjirx4 said:http://opensnow.com/dailysnow/utah
It appears that the mid-March dry spell in Utah will persist for more years than the mid-January dry spell.