The local population base is 8x Shames. And only only somewhat less than the 500K immediate drive-up base for the NZ club fields. So if the terrain and snow are good enough I could see local support.
MarcC":4b5s87xl said:
It would cost us ~$900 to get from SLC to Anchorage.
I'm flying RT SLC-Anchorage at the end of next week and the fare was $625. Nonetheless that was still high enough that I'm using mileage instead. And the overall point about expense is valid. Alyeska was quiet during the latter of part of my 2007 visit despite nice weather and the US Nationals being held there. NASJA members are complaining about the cost of this year's meeting there and I thus I predict relatively low attendance.
I agree with the other skeptical comments about non-local patronage.
1) Short season with the light: mid-February to mid-April.
2) Competition with other northern destinations, so NZ/SA comparisons don't necessarily apply.
3) "Not just about the skiing?" Maybe true in NZ/SA/Europe/Japan but a lot of Alaska's mainstream attractions (Denali, cruises, etc.) don't operate in the ski season.
4) I would be surprised if there are many Japanese skiers considering what they have at home. Maybe more of them back during the bubble years when Japanese ski areas were overcongested. Note the Japanese who built the Hotel Alyeska got out a few years ago.
So the success of this venture will depend on the locals IMHO. Alaskans are tough like the Kiwis. They will make do with the surface lifts if the ski product is good enough.
I agree with EMSC that only hydro is likely to make sense for possible energy production.
Good questions by Mike Bernstein; I hope we hear more details soon.