When (no BS) Do Eastern Powder Days Compare to Utah?

i said as good as many, not all or the majority. i added the presidentials cuz it has been stated that our terrain lacks out here. just cuz it doesn't have a lift doesn't mean it shouldn't count and for as much time as i've spent in the backcountry east and west, our little mountain range does have what any grand range of the west has, corn, powder, long seasons, 4000+ vert descents and not nearly as crowded in most areas as some would suspect and nowhere near as busy as the wasatch bc on most days given the same approach time and distance.
rog
 
icelanticskier":10sly1wf said:
east coast skiing also mostly exsists from it's long love and heritage of the sport. (...) the history of eastern skiing is so intimate and soulful and for many the feeling lives on.
Amen!!!
 
Tony Crocker":1gqfmlag said:
our resorts in northern maine have just as good and better snow preservation as many.
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. But compared to high altitude West or Alps, not even close. If this were true, why does Sugarloaf barely make it to May 1 in good years when Mammoth runs to Memorial Day in bad years?

Sugarloaf offers great late season conditions, having skied it a few times on it's last week. The problem here is similar to a few ski area like MSA or other more remote Quebec areas...the lack of customer at the end of the season due in part to distance from market.
 
The problem here is similar to a few ski area like MSA or other more remote Quebec areas...the lack of customer at the end of the season due in part to distance from market.
No. Sugarloaf was in fact open 1st weekend of May last year.

The East had back-to-back late seasons about as good as they can be in 2007 and 2008. And the fact remains that there was no lift-served natural snow base anywhere after the first week of May. In normal years it's more like mid-April. You can use the northern Vermont snowbelt and make a legitimate powder argument, but there is no eastern area where you can make a snow preservation argument vs. even average western areas. And that's not only a "when does the snow melt out" issue. It's also a melt/freeze issue. And don't forget that trademark of eastern skiing which most New England areas, Maine included, experienced last week. When was the last time it rained in a Colorado ski area during the season?
 
Tony Crocker":1gs2exoo said:
The problem here is similar to a few ski area like MSA or other more remote Quebec areas...the lack of customer at the end of the season due in part to distance from market.
No. Sugarloaf was in fact open 1st weekend of May last year.

The East had back-to-back late seasons about as good as they can be in 2007 and 2008. And the fact remains that there was no lift-served natural snow base anywhere after the first week of May. In normal years it's more like mid-April. You can use the northern Vermont snowbelt and make a legitimate powder argument, but there is no eastern area where you can make a snow preservation argument vs. even average western areas. And that's not only a "when does the snow melt out" issue. It's also a melt/freeze issue. And don't forget that trademark of eastern skiing which most New England areas, Maine included, experienced last week. When was the last time it rained in a Colorado ski area during the season?

what's wrong with rain? i skied beautiful snow in a light rain at cannon yesterday and earned the turns to make the experience even more pure and enjoyable. i know this forum is based mostly on lazy lift served skiing experiences. it amazes me that most of the utards on this forum spend so much time skiing lifts out there when the b.c. is so much better most all of the time.
rog
 
icelanticskier":19fcjsar said:
what's wrong with rain?

OK, we've endured your glass-half-full philosophy for a while now, but you've got to be kidding me! :roll:
 
Admin":360u2ch2 said:
icelanticskier":360u2ch2 said:
what's wrong with rain?

OK, we've endured your glass-half-full philosophy for a while now, but you've got to be kidding me! :roll:

hey, knew i could get you over here with that comment, but it's true. i mean c'mon, you softies out west way couldn't even fathom the beauty and serenity of skiing uphill in a warm light drizzle in total silence on a soft wet natural snow pack to reach the top and ski down on perfect untracked wendys frosty snow on similar terrain that our elders did on their old hickory sticks and no lifts to get them there. and next week or so we can rip up some great pow and celebrate the precious gift we've been given and not just expected.
rog
 
you softies out west way couldn't even fathom the beauty and serenity of skiing uphill in a warm light drizzle in total silence on a soft wet natural snow pack to reach the top and ski down on perfect untracked wendys frosty snow on similar terrain that our elders did on their old hickory sticks and no lifts to get them there.

Knock yerself out! I don't miss that heartache one bit.
 
Admin":1yeefhfz said:
icelanticskier":1yeefhfz said:
what's wrong with rain?

OK, we've endured your glass-half-full philosophy for a while now, but you've got to be kidding me! :roll:

Although rain can be a drag, Ice is right. Salida, GPetrics, K_C and I had a blast on that May rain day last year. The snow conditions are generally real good at that time, it's only after the temps drop again that it's get not so great. :o
 
Admin":1mop2hdi said:
you softies out west way couldn't even fathom the beauty and serenity of skiing uphill in a warm light drizzle in total silence on a soft wet natural snow pack to reach the top and ski down on perfect untracked wendys frosty snow on similar terrain that our elders did on their old hickory sticks and no lifts to get them there.

Knock yerself out! I don't miss that heartache one bit.

don't miss it? seems like you couldn't handle it.
rog
 
I rest my case. This thread started out as a comparison of powder experiences, and now the easterners are extolling the virtues of skiing in the rain! Delusional indeed.

I've skied a few days in the rain (which makes me certifiable to most westerners), and it can be enjoyable as long as your clothing holds out. But is it as good as powder, packed powder or spring corn? Not really, more like late spring isothermic.

I think rain in a ski area is like a bad version of getting drunk. Enjoyable for a couple of hours but the hangover
it's only after the temps drop again that it's not so great.
can last for a week or more.
 
Tony Crocker":kncuh11j said:
I rest my case. This thread started out as a comparison of powder experiences, and now the easterners are extolling the virtues of skiing in the rain! Delusional indeed.

I've skied a few days in the rain (which makes me certifiable to most westerners), and it can be enjoyable as long as your clothing holds out. But is it as good as powder, packed powder or spring corn? Not really, more like late spring isothermic.

I think rain in a ski area is like a bad version of getting drunk. Enjoyable for a couple of hours but the hangover
it's only after the temps drop again that it's get not so great.
can last for a week or more.

how many threads of this many posts actually stay on topic from beginning to end? not many. this thread didn't even start here. delusional? you have no clue. most true westerners have no clue or care to make an opinion of eastern skiing. it's mostly just the eastern wannabe western folks that stick their noses in the air at the skiing they came from. the true skiers appreciate all conditions in all places all of the time. you'll all evolve someday, maybe not in this lifetime. next time maybe.
rog
 
Man, I am fearful of even jumping into this East-West Coast battle, but I have skied both East and West for over 30 years and I have never had an "Epic" day on the East Coast. Yes, I've been in Vermont during a 18" powder day, about as good as it gets, but never had anything that compares to the many 24" plus powder days I've had at Alta and Targhee. The terrain out West is so much more condusive to powders skiing, steep, open, loose glades, pillowed landing off of headwalls.... Even two days after a storm, you can always find plenty of fresh with a little skiing and some avy gear.

I'm out!!
 
Lifty@50":3vy3ovzi said:
Man, I am fearful of even jumping into this East-West Coast battle, but I have skied both East and West for over 30 years and I have never had an "Epic" day on the East Coast. Yes, I've been in Vermont during a 18" powder day, about as good as it gets, but never had anything that compares to the many 24" plus powder days I've had at Alta and Targhee. The terrain out West is so much more condusive to powders skiing, steep, open, loose glades, pillowed landing off of headwalls.... Even two days after a storm, you can always find plenty of fresh with a little skiing and some avy gear.

I'm out!!

uh ha, move along through the corral into the stable with the rest of the one dimensionals.
rog
 
Patrick":2idp0owo said:
Based on JSpin's Waterbury and EC Ottawa Airport numbers.

JSpin snowtotal in Waterbury VT as of Dec 11th: 38 inches
Ottawa Airport Environment Canada snowdata as of Dec 11th: 30 inches

Regardless of surrounding terrain, I would suspect that snow banks and snow quality is currentlygreater in my backyard than at J's house. It definitely snows more in VT, but that higher numbers just says that it's snow more, which isn't necessarily correlated with snow quality or quality of skiing.
I agree that snowfall numbers don’t tell the whole story on snow quality, but if only one parameter could be used compare snow quality between different areas, snowfall is probably the best bet (it certainly is for me). If the value for total snowfall is zero, short of some sort of snowmaking, the rest of the parameters don’t matter much. Even in an area that gets a lot of snow, and has some thaws, high snowfall means that resurfacing can come quickly. If powder is what one wants to ski, then there’s little question that annual snowfall is the best indicator of the ability to get what you want, because it pretty much sets the upper limit on how much fresh snow you’ll ever get to put your skis in. I know there are many folks that would prefer a place that simply has great snow preservation and doesn’t necessarily get lots of snow (say like Lake Louise for example). That’s probably a good bet if you are going to plan a trip long in advance, or aren’t all that interested in powder. But for me, I’d rather live in a place that gets me more snow (powder skiing), even if it means a little more volatility in temperatures like say Northern Vermont or Fernie. Our spot in Waterbury is even a localized example of this, as we get lots of snowfall, but upslope snow contributes a lot to it and that doesn’t have a ton of liquid equivalent that is going to go into the snowpack. Also, with our low elevation we don’t preserve the snow as well as places in the 1,000’ to 2,000’ elevation range because of temperature fluctuations. I bet even Ottawa could have better preservation that our location. One good measure of snow preservation is to sum the depth of the snowpack on the ground for each day of the season. This parameter is often called “snow depth days” and I haven’t done it, but I could generate the number from my Waterbury snowpack data. I bet the weather service in Ottawa would have that number. Obviously high snowfall AND preservation make for a great combination, but it’s not necessarily going to get you any more powder days.

In terms of the current quality of skiing around here, I think issues with the snow have being dramatically overblown due to the big ice storm that affected areas to the south. We got some mixed precipitation that made a crust around here, but it’s a relatively thin, breakable crust that now has additional snow on top of it (and a little snow on top of a breakable crust really helps improve the skiing over just breakable crust alone because it changes the angle with which you skis cut into it.) For skiing at the house, our snowpack is only at 10 inches at this elevation, but that last storm did throw another inch of liquid equivalent into it, so that is a definite boost to the valley skiing. While there is a base layer below this latest dump and the snow is ready for turns, I’d still probably wait for one more big dump before hitting our local backcountry. I suspect some of our mellower glades would be fine even now since they are at a bit higher elevation and don’t have any rocks, but a place like Hemlock Gully, that is quite steep, faces southward, and drops back down to just a couple hundred feet above the house elevation will need another foot of good base.

The snow in the mountains around here looks to be in nice shape, based even on Roger’s report from Timberline before any snow fell on top of the crust, and he’s pretty critical of conditions. But we found decent conditions up at Bolton on Friday night after additional snow fell, and Jumpin’ Jimmy’s report from Stowe yesterday sounded good. Then of course there’s Scott’s report with the usual collection of nice pictures to back everything up. I think there’s just been a lot of pissing and moaning about conditions over the past couple of days because the last storm wasn’t 100% powder everywhere, but even the off-piste skiing around here is pretty nice. It’s warmed up into the 20s F today so we’ll probably stop up to Bolton for some turns this afternoon. I’ll provide an update if we head out.

-J
 
If powder is what one wants to ski, then there’s little question that annual snowfall is the best indicator of the ability to get what you want, because it pretty much sets the upper limit on how much fresh snow you’ll ever get to put your skis in.
That was the point of my 6-inch and 12-inch powder day analysis last June. The expected number of 6+ or 12+ inch days in a month is a linear function of total monthly snowfall. So if somebody tries to brag on their great powder days at some sub-200 annual inch area like Lake Louise, Sun Valley, Cannon or Sugarloaf, they were at best extremely lucky because those days are exceedingly rare. Or maybe the powder sector they skied was closed for 3-4 days of the typical 3-inch snowfalls those areas get.

The one aspect where preservation matters for powder skiing is what Riverc0il referred to as "the 40-inch rule." This being the necessary natural snowpack for safely skiing in the woods. Northern Vermont has demonstrated historically that it maintains that base for 2+ months most seasons, while Cannon for example has not. There may be a few areas in Quebec where the preservation offsets the lower natural snow vs. Vermont so that a consistent natural base can be attained. But the frequency of 6+ or 12+ powder days will still be lower than Vermont.

Thanks to JSpin for putting the thread back on track :wink: . It's easy for me to see why JSpin is a contented eastern skier. He doesn't really care about how often conditions are crappy. His nearly sole priority is how much powder he gets. That and training the next generation of ski rock stars.

Obviously high snowfall AND preservation make for a great combination
That would be Snowbird :mrgreen:
 
Tony Crocker":2nxa1nv0 said:
The one aspect where preservation matters for powder skiing is what Riverc0il referred to as "the 40-inch rule." This being the necessary natural snowpack for safely skiing in the woods

That's a opinion not shared by all. Just check out any of TR's and suppoting pics on the skivt list serv with the Mansfield stake at 25"
 
Back
Top