A few decent jokes at the Dems' expense in Bill Maher's monologue last night -- especially the one about the Georgia Secretary of State.
As I pointed out a few days before the election ^^, the Dems are helpless against the GOP's masterful practitioners of the dark Machiavellian arts. On that note, Bret Stephens gets to say I told you so repeatedly while diehard lefty Gail Collins stews and eats crow.the clubfooted Dems have been unsuccessful in defeating him decisively after ten years
Love the Pennsylvania line.Listen, I have been pro-Trump all along.
Dislike him personally, but overwhelmingly support his transactional values.
Trump currently has a popular vote lead of 4.5 million (3.3%), which is likely to end up more like 3.5 million after California is fully counted.
Trump's popular vote lead is down to 3 million and 2.0% now (California is 88% counted). The margin in tipping point Pennsylvania is 1.8%, so currently there is a tiny 0.2% electoral college bias in favor of the Democrats in 2024, which may vanish when California is done.Refer to the table of electoral college bias since 1952 that I posted earlier. The bias on average is a measly 0.12% in favor of the Republicans and should get even closer to zero with final 2024 numbers.
You can slice and dice the beans all you want about which party it favored. The electoral college needs to go, full stop (of course it won't in my lifetime, possibly ever).The margin in tipping point Pennsylvania is 1.8%, so currently there is a tiny 0.2% electoral college bias in favor of the Democrats in 2024, which may vanish when California is done.
I take this as poor understanding of why it exists in the first place. It was not some historical accident as many MSM will pitch it today, it was a very intentional set up and remains very important, though I also fully expect that we will agree to disagree on the topic.The electoral college needs to go, full stop (of course it won't in my lifetime, possibly ever).
Yes it's a relic, and the rationale for it in 1787 no longer applies. My point is that long term it is not biased toward a particular party, small vs. large states, etc. The extremely high 3.82% bias in 2020 was alarming but thankfully it was wiped out this time and hopefully is a very rare occurrence going forward. Both parties would be well advised to direct their reform efforts toward objectives that don't require amending the Constitution IMHO.You can slice and dice the beans all you want about which party it favored. The electoral college needs to go, full stop (of course it won't in my lifetime, possibly ever).
The rural red states are every bit as irrelevant as NY and CA to the Electoral College. What relevant are the swing states, 7 of them this time.The EC is built to keep rural areas relevant, right? It does do that.
Yes it's a relic, and the rationale for it in 1787 no longer applies.
Disagree with first statementBoth parties would be well advised to direct their reform efforts toward objectives that don't require amending the Constitution IMHO.